IMAGES IN ONCOLOGY

Liver epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: are there CT and MRI specific criteria?

 Hemangioendoteliomul epitelioid hepatic: există criterii CT şi IRM specifice?

First published: 18 decembrie 2023

Editorial Group: MEDICHUB MEDIA

DOI: 10.26416/OnHe.65.4.2023.8953

Abstract

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is a rare vas­cular tumor of endothelial origin which may present as a solitary nodule or, more frequently, as multifocal nodules that tend to coalesce into a diffuse lesion. CT and MR ima­ging are important to make a complete liver HEH in­volve­ment and to assess the presence of extrahepatic disease. The pathological exam remains the gold standard to con­firm the diagnosis of HEH. In this case presentation, we dis­cuss and illustrate the CT and MRI findings of HEH.

Keywords
epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, CT and MRI criteria

Rezumat

Hemangioendoteliomul epitelioid hepatic (HEH) este o tumoră vas­culară rară cu origine endotelială, care se poate prezenta sub forma unui nodul solitar sau, mai frecvent, sub formă de no­duli multipli care tind să se unească într-o leziune difuză. Ima­gisti­ca prin CT şi rezonanţă magnetică (IRM) este importantă pentru a realiza o eva­lua­­re completă a ficatului în HEH şi pentru a evalua pre­zen­ţa bo­lii extrahepatice. Examenul morfopatologic rămâne stan­dar­dul de aur pentru a confirma diagnosticul de HEH. În această pre­zen­tare de caz, vom discuta şi ilustra aspectele CT şi IRM în­tâl­ni­te în HEH.

Introduction

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is a vascular tumor of endothelial origin with low to intermediate grade malignancy. HEH may present as a solitary nodule or, more frequently, as multifocal nodules which tend to coalesce into diffuse lesions in the late stages of the disease. Nodules and diffuse liver mass may coexist. CT and MR imaging are important to make a complete liver evaluation of HEH involvement and to highlight the presence of extrahepatic disease. The pathological exam remains the gold standard to confirm the diagnostic of HEH.

Case presentation

The patient D.M., female, 63 years old, with anorexia and diffuse abdominal pain, was referred by the gastroenterologist for an abdominal ultrasound (US). The laboratory tests were without particularities.  Because the US images reveled inhomogeneous hepatomegaly with steatosis areas, an MRI evaluation was performed. The patient was explored in the supine position with a surface phased-array coil. For the complete evaluation of liver lesions, breath-hold coronal T2-weighted short TE sequences were initially performed, followed by transverse T1-weighted dual-echo in-phase and out-phase sequences. Three-dimensional (3D) fat-saturated (FS) T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences were performed during suspended respiration (gadoxetic acid; 0.1 mmol/kg) injected intravenously at a rate of 1 ml/s. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was performed in the transverse plane followed by the hepatic late arterial phase (after 35 s), portal venous (after 70 s) and delay phases (180 s). After dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D T1 FS weighted imaging, transverse respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted (DWI) single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence was performed by using two b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm2, followed by T2 FS fast spin echo sequence. The hepatobiliary phase was performed 20 minutes after contrast material i.v. injection.

The MRI exam revealed tumoral left liver nodules and a large tumoral mass located at the periphery of the right liver lobe with extension to capsule, the presence of capsular retraction and a “target” sign appearance (Figure 1).
 

Figure 1. MRI evaluation: large heterogenous right liver mass with a peripheric topography, fibrotic central component, progressive enhancement (hemangioma-like contrast enhancement-arrow) and capsular retraction (dotted arrow). Multiple left liver lobe nodules, some of them with capsular retraction
Figure 1. MRI evaluation: large heterogenous right liver mass with a peripheric topography, fibrotic central component, progressive enhancement (hemangioma-like contrast enhancement-arrow) and capsular retraction (dotted arrow). Multiple left liver lobe nodules, some of them with capsular retraction

Into the list of possible diagnostics, there enter epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, angiosarcoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, combined form of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (Figure 2), diffuse hepatocellular carcinoma (Figure 3), treated liver malignancy, and confluent fibrosis. In order to have the final pathological diagnostic, a biopsy under CT was performed.
 

Figure 2. Similar enhance­ment pattern in a combined hepa­to­cellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (long arrow): MRI eva­lua­tion with Gd-EOB-DTPA in late arterial phase, por­tal venous phase and hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Note the presence of mul­ti­ple small nodules seen  in HBP (small arrow)
Figure 2. Similar enhance­ment pattern in a combined hepa­to­cellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (long arrow): MRI eva­lua­tion with Gd-EOB-DTPA in late arterial phase, por­tal venous phase and hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Note the presence of mul­ti­ple small nodules seen in HBP (small arrow)


 

Figure 3. Diffuse hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow) with portal venous tumoral thrombosis (small arrow). MRI evaluation with Gd-EOB-DTPA in axial plane (portal venous phase and HBP) and coronal plane in HBP
Figure 3. Diffuse hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow) with portal venous tumoral thrombosis (small arrow). MRI evaluation with Gd-EOB-DTPA in axial plane (portal venous phase and HBP) and coronal plane in HBP

The histopathological exam (Figure 4) highlighted the pattern of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma based on malignant angiocentric vascular neoplasm composed of epithelioid endothelial cells with characteristic myxohyaline or fibrous stroma most commonly with WWTR1-CAMTA1 or YAP1-TFE3 fusion (courtesy to Dr. Mihaela Mihai).
 

Figure 4. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: malignant angiocentric vascular neoplasm composed of epithelioid endothelial cells with characteristic myxohyaline or fibrous stroma
Figure 4. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: malignant angiocentric vascular neoplasm composed of epithelioid endothelial cells with characteristic myxohyaline or fibrous stroma

The multidisciplinary team decided, in this case, to performed an orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), but before the liver transplant, a CT was done. Non-contrast and three-phase dynamic contrast-enhancement CT scan were performed. The delay between the first MR evaluation and the CT exam was four months. The conclusion of the CT evaluation was in favor of HEH progression, with hepatomegaly and ascites (Figure 5).
 

Figure 5. Progression  of the HEH in the right and left liver paren­chy­ma (arrows). Hepatomegaly. Ascites (A): multiplanar contrast CT reconstructions in portal venous phase
Figure 5. Progression of the HEH in the right and left liver paren­chy­ma (arrows). Hepatomegaly. Ascites (A): multiplanar contrast CT reconstructions in portal venous phase

After the OLT, the clinical evolution was good, such as the imaging monitoring with normal ultrasound (US) and CT findings (Figure 6).
 

Figure 6. Contrast enhanced CT in coronal plane recon­structions, two months after OLT – normal CT aspect
Figure 6. Contrast enhanced CT in coronal plane recon­structions, two months after OLT – normal CT aspect

Discussion

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a locally aggressive vascular neoplasm originating from vascular endothelial or pre-endothelial cells. It can arise anywhere in the body and can metastasize to the viscera, bones and soft tissue. The most common sites of involvement are the liver, bone and lung(1,2).

The clinical presentation of EHE is nonspecific and usually consists of signs and symptoms related to the involvement of local organs by the primary tumor or meta­stases. Approximately 28% of the patients with EHE have no symptoms, and their tumor is discovered incidentally(2).

HEH appears to have a clinical course between benign hemangioma and angiosarcoma. The World Health Organization classifies HEH as a malignant tumor(10). In the majority of patients, both lobes of the liver are involved, and lung, peritoneum, lymph nodes and bone are the most common sites of simultaneous extrahepatic involvement(1,3). HEH predominantly occurs in adult females. The etiology of HEH remains unknown; however, it may be associated with oral contraceptive use, exposure to polyethylene, trauma or viral hepatitis(3).

The imaging findings of hepatic HEH vary according to the stage of the disease, and two patterns have been reported: a nodular pattern, which is seen in the early stage of the disease, and a diffuse pattern, which is typically seen in advanced stages, appearing as confluent coalescent masses that can be associated with hepatic vascular invasion. Commonly, liver nodules are multifocal, distributed in the periphery of the liver, and may be accompanied by capsular retraction(4-7).

Imaging plays a major role in determining the sites of involvement, which has an important prognostic significance and it also can help guide US or CT biopsy and to monitor the response to treatment. On unenhanced CT, lesions are iso- or hypo-attenuated to the liver parenchyma. Small foci of calcification may be present. The enhancement characteristics show in general peripheral enhancement in the arterial phase in association with stronger enhancement in portal and late phase manifesting as a target sign(1,6-9).

On MRI, most HEH lesions are T1 hypointense and heterogeneously T2 hyperintense relative to uninvolved liver parenchyma. Some lesions may have a concentric zonal or targetoid appearance (black or white) on T2 and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Black target-like sign corresponds to a central T2 hypointensity and a reduced enhancement after contrast injection due to areas of avascular stroma, hemorrhage, necrosis and calcification; peripheral hyperintensity and increased enhancement correspond to edematous connective tissue and viable tumor(9-11). The periphery of the tumor shows markedly hyperintensity on DWI, representing hypercellular tumor, whereas central regions show hypointensity on high-b value images as a result of relatively hypocellular, myxoid and fibrous stroma(11). Liver capsular retraction may be present in most patients with HEH (Figure 7).
 

Figure 7. Target sign, cap­su­lar retraction and central fibrotic stroma are imaging findings found in HEH (arrows)
Figure 7. Target sign, cap­su­lar retraction and central fibrotic stroma are imaging findings found in HEH (arrows)

More seldom, nodular enhancement along the central vessels (“lollipop” sign) can be found in HEH.

The natural prognosis of HEH depends on the primary site of involvement, the grade of the tumor, the presence of invasion of critical structures, and the presence of metastases(1-11).

Liver transplant (LT) can be curative for patients with HEH in which complete surgical resection is not possible. Limited extrahepatic extension is not a contraindication for LT(12). Recurrent HEH is seen in approximately 25% of patients after liver transplant(12)

Conclusions

The imaging findings of HEH vary in correlation to the stage of the disease. Lesions are commonly multifocal, distributed into the periphery of the hepatic parenchyma, with a target sign pattern, and may be accompanied by capsular retraction. Because also other types of primary and metastatic liver tumors can have theses aspects, intratumoral biopsy with pathological exam offers the final positive diagnostic.  

 

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Financial support: none declared.

This work is permanently accessible online free of charge and published under the CC-BY licence.

Bibliografie

  1. Jang JK, Thomas R, Braschi-Amirfarzan M, Jagannathan JP. A Review of the Spectrum of Imaging Manifestations of Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215(5):1290-1298.

  2. Lau K, Massad M, Pollak C, et al. Clinical patterns and outcome in epithelioid hemangio­endothelioma with or without pulmonary involvement: insights from an internet registry in the study of a rare cancer. Chest. 2011;140(5):1312-1318.

  3. Makhlouf HR, Ishak KG, Goodman ZD. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: A clinicopathologic study of 137 cases. Cancer. 1999;85(3):562-582. 

  4. Furui S, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, et al. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: report of five cases. Radiology. 1989;171(1):63–68

  5. Gan LU, Chang R, Jin H, Yang LI. Typical CT and MRI signs of hepatic epithelioid heman­gio­endothelioma. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(3):1699-1706.   

  6. Chen Y, Yu RS, Qiu LL, Jiang DY, Tan YB, Fu YB. Contrast-enhanced multiple-phase ima­ging features in hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(30):3544-3553.

  7. Van Beers B, Roche A, Mathieu D, Menu Y, Delos M, Otte JB, Lalonde L, Pringot J. Epi­the­lioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: MR and CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16(3):420424. 

  8. Kim EH, Rha SE, Lee YJ, Yoo IR, Jung ES, Byun JY. CT and MR imaging findings of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas: Emphasis on single nodular type. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(3):500-509.

  9. Gam L, Chang R, Jib H, Yang L. Typical CT and MRI signs of hepatic epithelioid heman­gio­en­do­thelioma. Oncology Letters. 2016;11(3):1699-1706.

  10. Liu X, Yu H, Zhang Z, et al. MRI appearances of hepatic epithelioid hemangio­endo­the­lio­ma: a retrospective study of 57 patients. Insights into Imaging. 2022;13(1):65.

  11. Bruegel M, Muenzel D, Waldt S, Specht K, Rummeny EJ. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: Findings at CT and MRI including preliminary observations at diffusion-weighted echoplanar imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(4):415-424.

  12. Remiszewski P, Szczerba E, Kalinowski P, Gierej B, Dudek K, Grodzicki M, Kotulski M, Paluszkiewicz R, Patkowski W, Zieniewicz K, Krawczyk M. Epithelioid heman­gio­en­do­thelioma of the liver as a rare indication for liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(32):11333-11339.