SURGERY

Proceduri ginecologice laparoscopice în timpul sarcinii

 Laparoscopic gynecological procedures during pregnancy

First published: 16 iunie 2017

Editorial Group: MEDICHUB MEDIA

DOI: 10.26416/Peri.1.2.2017.837

Abstract

The incidence of surgical nonobstetrical procedures during pregnancy has a small range. Performing surgery during pregnancy can be challenging because both mother’s life and fetus viability should be considered, and both of them can be injured during these procedures. Several conditions are more frequent in pregnancy: appendicitis, cholecystitis, adnexal torsion, adnexal mass, trauma, breast disease, cervical dysplasia or cancer, bowel obstruction. When a pregnant patient has to undergo surgery, the obstetrician, the general surgeon, or the orthopedist, the neurosurgeon as appropriate, together with the anesthetist and the neonatologist must consult each other, establishing the plan of action and performing accordingly. Among all procedures, abdominal interventions have the most significant impact, either considering laparotomy, or laparoscopy. There are several advantages of laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy: decreased pain, smaller abdominal incisions, smaller scars, fewer incisional hernias, shorter recovery and hospitalization time, early normal bowel function and mobilization. There are also some possible disadvantages, such as injuring the pregnant uterus, decreasing uterine blood flow by increased intraabdominal pressure or even carbon dioxide absorption by mother and fetus. Data supporting laparoscopy in pregnancy suggest that laparoscopy can be done safely during pregnancy.

 

Keywords
laparoscopy, pregnancy, gynecological procedures

Rezumat

Incidenţa procedurilor chirurgicale neobstetricale în timpul sarcinii este relativ mică. Intervenţia chirurgicală în timpul sarcinii poate fi o provocare, deoarece trebuie avute în vedere atât viaţa mamei, cât şi viabilitatea fătului, iar ambii pot fi afectaţi în timpul acestor proceduri. Câteva afecţiuni sunt mai frecvente în timpul sarcinii: apendicita, colecistita, torsiunea anexială, masele anexiale, traumatismele, patologia sânului, displazia cervicală sau cancerul cervical, obstrucţia intestinală. Dintre toate procedurile, intervenţiile abdominale au cel mai mare impact, fie că este vorba despre laparotomie sau laparoscopie. Există mai multe avantaje ale chirurgiei laparoscopice în timpul sarcinii: reducerea durerii, incizii mai mici, cicatrice mai mici, hernii incizionale reduse, recuperarea mai scurtă, timpul de spitalizare redus, reluarea precoce a funcţiei intestinale normale şi mobilizarea timpurie. Există, de asemenea, posibile dezavantaje, cum ar fi rănirea uterului gravid, scăderea fluxului sanguin uterin prin creşterea presiunii intraabdominale sau chiar absorbţia dioxidului de carbon de către mamă şi făt. Datele din literatură în sprijinul laparo­scopiei sugerează că aceasta se poate face în siguranţă în timpul sarcinii.
 

Introduction

The incidence of surgical nonobstetrical procedures during pregnancy is about 0.75 percent(1). Performing surgery during pregnancy can be challenging because both mother’s life and fetus viability should be considered, and both of them can be injured during these procedures. Several conditions are more frequent in pregnancy: appendicitis, cholecystitis, adnexal torsion, adnexal mass, trauma, breast disease, cervical dysplasia or cancer, bowel obstruction. Among all procedures, abdominal interventions have the most important impact, either considering laparotomy, or laparoscopy. In the last years, laparoscopy seems to be the treatment of choice in gynecologic pathology during pregnancy, and there is evidence that supports that it is a safe procedure to perform during pregnacy(2,3-6). There are several advantages of laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy: decreased pain, smaller abdominal incisions, smaller scars, fewer incisional hernias, shorter recovery and hospitalization time, early normal bowel function and mobilization. There are also possible some disadvantages, such as injuring the pregnant uterus, decreasing uterine blood flow by increased intraabdominal pressure or even carbon dioxide absorption by mother and fetus. 

Technique

Because of the enlarged uterus, the placement of the trocars is important for a successful operation. The patient is placed in left side-down position. The access to the abdomen is made through an open technique. Usually, we use 5-mm laparoscopes for the sides and a 10-mm laparoscope superior to the umbilicus. In their study, Carter and Soper used 3-mm laparoscopes superior to the umbilicus on uteri that were at or above the umbilicus(7,8). Uterine manipulation must be minimal and intraperitoneal pressures must be kept below 12-mm Hg(6,9). Tocolytic drugs are recommended to be used in case of uterine manipulation(10).

Imaging

Ultrasounds. Adnexal mass are usually discovered at routine ultrasound obstetrical examination. The IOTA (International Ovarian Tumor Analysis) criteria are used to characterize ovarian pathology. Although there is no evidence of the specific use of these criteria in pregnant women, ultrasounds as an examination with high sensitivity and specificity is also very useful during pregnancy (Kaijser et al., 2014(11)).
Magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be used when ultrasound examination is unclear and there is a high suspicion of malignancy. MRI is safely used during the second and third trimester, usually with no contrast because gadolinium doesn’t have enough safety data available. 
Tumor markers. CA-125, AFP, b-hCG, Inhibine B and AMH are tumor markers that can be associated with ovarian tumor growth. Physiological decidual and amnion cells produce CA-125, so the CA-125 level is higher pregnancy. Still, CA-125 level may help making the difference between benign and malignant tumors. AFP (related to germ cell tumors), Inhibine B and AMH (related to granulosa cell tumors) levels are higher in pregnacy and are used for follow-up(12,13). 

Adnexal torsion

Ovarian torsion, also known as adnexal torsion or tubo-ovarian torsion, refers to an emergency condi­tion where the rotation of the ovary and portion of the fallopian tube on the supplying vascular pedicle can compromise the blood supply. The result can be arterial, venous and lymphatic stasis, leading to ovarian and fallopian tube necrosis. Either intermittent, or sustained stasis, early diagnostic and laparoscopy are important in order to preserve the adnexa. Approximately 20% of the cases occur during pregnancy(14). Hypermobility of the ovary and adnexal mass are the two main reason of adnexal tor­sion(15). Dermoid cysts and para ovarian cysts are frequently incriminated, and at most risk are masses between 5-10 cm(16). Adnexal torsion mainly occurs during the first trimester of pregnancy(17-21). In pregnacy, adnexal torsion can occur as a complication of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(22,23). Shalev et al.(24-26) have reported 41 patients with adnexal torsion, including 10 pregnant patients who had a favorable outcome. There is a common trend to consider laparoscopy the treatment of choice in adnexal torsion, being a safe procedure if special precautions are adhered to. Depending on the size of the cyst and the gestation age, aspiration, detorsion and subsequent cystectomy can be practiced.

Adnexal mass

The reported incidence of adnexal mass complicating pregnancy is about 0.2-2%, with a malignancy rate of 1-6%(27-29). Benign adnexal masses discovered during early pregnancy can be: functional cyst (corpus luteum, follicular cyst, haemorrhagic cyst), dermoid cyst, serous cystadenoma, mucinous cystadenoma, endometrioma, leiomyomas, and paraovarian cyst(27-32). Corpus luteum cysts and benign cystic teratomas has each one third(32,33). Cystic masses are conservative treated till the second trimester or even after delivery. Depending on evolution of the cyst, measures must be taken. Often, there is a spontaneous resolution of functional cysts(34,35). If masses persist or grow larger, they must be removed in order to prevent torsion or rupture. Non-functional cyst usually persists after 16 weeks of gestation(13,30,36,37). In cases where there is no need for surgical treatment during pregnancy, only survey is sufficient till delivery. Otherwise, laparoscopic procedure should optimally be done between 16 and 20 weeks of gestation(27,38). Suspicious features like vascula­rized septa, solid components, papillae or nodules require further investigation through Magnetic Resonance Imaging and tumour markers analyzes(39). Although ovarian cancer during pregnancy is rare, any sign of malignancy must be taken into consideration and appropriate treatment must be applied. The termination of pregnancy is indicated in early pregnancy, and chemotherapy can be safely used during second and third trimesters.

Conclusions

Gynecological disorders during pregnancy such as ovarian cysts and masses must first be thoroughly assessed by ultrasound examination and, if the situation requires, by MRI examination, safely done during the second and the third trimesters. Also, CA-125 level may be useful in distinguishing a benign from malignant disease. The moment of surgery is an important aspect. Small benign painless cysts should only be under surveillance as they may spontaneously remit, and large cysts or cysts that last over 16 weeks should be reassessed and undergo surgery. When a pregnant patient has to undergo surgery, the obstetrician, the general surgeon, or the orthopedist, the neurosurgeon as appropriate, together with the anesthetist and the neonatologist must consult each other and take a decision. There are several advantages of laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy: decreased pain, smaller abdominal incisions, smaller scars, fewer incisio­nal hernias, shorter recovery and hospitalization time, early normal bowel function and mobilization. There are also possible some disadvantages, such as injuring the pregnant uterus, decreasing uterine blood flow by increased intraabdominal pressure or even carbon dioxide­ absorption by mother and fetus. Adnexal torsion and benign ovarian cysts and masses can be safely operated during first and second trimester. Although ovarian cancer during pregnancy is rare, any sign of malignancy must be taken into consideration and appropriate treatment must be applied. The termination of pregnancy is indicated in early pregnancy, and chemotherapy can be safely used during second and third trimesters.   n

Bibliografie

1. Mazze RI, Källén B. Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: a registry study of 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161:1178.
2. Graham G, Baxi L, Tharakan T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy: a case series and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998; l9:556-574.
3. Hunter JG, Swanstrom L, Thornberg K. Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum induces fetal acidosis in a pregnant ewe model. Surg Endosc. 1995; 9:272-279.
4. Reedy MB, Galan HL, Richards WE, Preece CK, Wetter PA, Kuehl TJ. Laparoscopy during Pregnancy. A survey of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. J Reprod Med. 1997; 42:33-38.
5. Reedy MB, Kallen B, Kuehl TJ. Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a study of five fetal outcome parameters with use of the Swedish Health Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177:673- 680.
6. Duncan PG, Pope WDB, Cohen MM, et al. Fetal risk of anesthesia and surgery during pregnancy. Anesthesiology, 1986; 64:790-794.
7. Carter JF, Soper DE. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy in pregnancy. Laparoscopy Today. March 2005.
8. Carter J, Chang E, Haynes G, Scardo J. Hemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Surg. 1997; 13:169-173.
9. Carter JF, Soper DE. Laparoscopy in pregnancy. JSLS. 2004; 8:57-60.
10. Amant F, Halaska MJ, Fumagalli M, et al. Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines of a second international consensus meeting. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014; 24:394–403.
11. Kaijser J, Sayasneh A, Van Hoorde K. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20:449–462.
12. Giuntoli RL 2nd, Vang RS, Bristow RE. Evaluation and management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49:492–505.
13. Leiserowitz G. Managing ovarian masses during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2006; 61:463–470.
14. Bider D, Mashiach S, Dulitzky M et al. Clinical, surgical and pathologic findings of adnexal torsion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991; 173 (5): 363-6. 
15. Dähnert W. Radiology Review Manual. Hubsta Ltd, 2007.
16. Amirbekian S, Hooley RJ. Ultrasound Evaluation of Pelvic Pain. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2014; 52 (6): 1215-1235. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.008
17. Hibbard, LT. Adnexal torsion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152: 456–461.
18. Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, Bar-On S, Almog B, Mashiach R. et al. Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 536.e1–536.e6.
19. Smorgick N, Pansky M, Feingold M, Herman A, Halperin R and Maymon R. The clinical characteristics and sonographic findings of maternal ovarian torsion in pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1983–1987.
20. Bider D, Mashiach S, Dulitzky M, Kokia E, Kipitz S, and Ben-Rafael Z. Clinical, surgical and pathologic findings of adnexal torsion in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991; 173: 363–366.
21. Rackow B and Patrizio P. Successful pregnancy complicated by early and late adnexal torsion after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2007; 87: 697e9–697e12.
22. Garzarelli S, Marruca N. One laparoscopic puncture for treatment of ovarian cysts with adnexal torsion in early pregnancy. A report of two cases. J Reprod Med 1994; 39: 985–986. 
23. Mashiach S, Bider D, Moran O et al. Adnexal torsion of hyperstimulated ovaries in pregnancies after gonadotropin therapy. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 76–80. 
24. Shalev E, Rahav D, Romano S. Laparoscopic relief of adnexal torsion in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 853–854. 
25. Shalev E, Peleg D. Laparoscopic treatment of adnexal torsion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 176: 448–450. 
26. Shalev E. Laparoscopic unwinding of hyperstimulated ovaries during the second trimester of pregnancy [lettr]. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 460. 
27. Hoover K, Jenkins TR. Evaluation and management of adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205:97–102.
28. Runowicz CD, Brewer M. Barbieir RL (Ed), UpToDate. 2015. Adnexal mass in pregnancy.
29. Telischak NA, Yeh BM, Joe BN, et al. MRI of adnexal masses in pregnancy. AJR AM J Roentgenol. 2008; 191:364–370.
30. Glanc P, Salem S, Farine D. Adnexal masses in the pregnant patient: a diagnostic and management challenge. Ultrasound Q. 2008; 24:225–240.
31. Parsons AK. Imaging the human corpus luteum. J Ultrasound Med. 2001; 20:811–819.
32. Whitecar MP, Turner S, Higby MK. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: a review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181:19–24.
33. Yuen PM, Chang AMZ. Laparoscopic management of adnexal mass during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 173–176.
34. Struyk APHB, Treffers PE. Ovarian tumors in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63: 421–424.
35. Parker WH, Childers JM, Canis M et al. Laparoscopic management of benign cystic teratomas during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1499–1501.
36. Chiang G, Levine D. Imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2004; 23:805–819.
37. Hoffman MS. Barbieir RL (Ed), UpToDate. 2015. Differential diagnosis of the adnexal mass.
38. Amant F, Brepoels L, Halaska MJ, et al. Gynaecologic cancer complicating pregnancy: an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 24:61–79.
39. De Haan J, Verheecke M, Amant F. Management of ovarian cysts and cancer in pregnancy. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn. 2015; 7(1):25-31.