OBSTETRICS

Următorul pas în monitorizare – Registrul Național al Anomaliilor Congenitale din România (RN-CAR)

The next step in monitoring – the Romanian National Congenital Anomaly Registry (RN-CAR)

Abstract

Congenital anomalies or congenital malformations involve the presence of malformations with which an individual is born, according to the definition of the World Health Or­ga­ni­za­tion. Many of these anomalies have a genetic com­po­nent, and some can be caused by prenatal exposure to te­ra­to­ge­nic factors, while others may have a multifactorial or unknown etiology. Overall, these malformations result in struc­tu­ral changes, functional abnormalities ranging from mild to severe, and can affect the long-term development of the fetus and newborn. Worldwide, any type of congenital mal­for­ma­tion has a significant impact on the quality of life of the individuals, as well as on their family. The Romanian So­cie­ty of Obstetrics and Gynecology had a significant role in elaborating dedicated protocols and in introducing uni­ver­sal prenatal testing over the last 20 years. These ac­tions in­creased the diagnosis of fetal malformations. Pre­ven­ting the exposure to known teratogen, improving scre­ening me­thods and improving environmental and ma­ter­nal con­di­tions had a significant role in managing the preg­nan­cies. The increased experience among time, the ad­van­ces in prenatal diagnosis, and the dedicated me­di­cal per­so­n­nel in overspecialized fields led to early diag­no­sis and dif­fe­rent options in the cases with a diagnosis of con­ge­ni­tal mal­for­ma­tion during pregnancy. The role of a con­ge­ni­tal malformations registry is to realize a systematic and com­pre­hen­sive database that collects, stores and analyzes in­for­ma­tion about congenital malformations detected at birth or during pregnancy. The importance of such a re­gis­try can be seen in other countries that had developed this type of registry for many years. The benefits include es­sen­tial as­pects for public health, medical research and pa­tient care. The registry can enable the identification of trends and patterns in the appearance of congenital mal­for­ma­tions. Identifying risk factors and potential causes in some po­pu­la­tions can help to implement preventive mea­sures. A well-established registry can contribute to plan­ning ne­ces­sary medical and social resources for the care of children with congenital malformations. As we con­si­der that the Ro­ma­nian National Congenital Anomaly Re­gis­try (RN-CAR) is the next step in the fetal malformation diag­no­sis and sub­se­quent management, we present in this paper the be­ne­fits of a national database for both patients and doc­tors.



Keywords
congenital malformationsdatabasecongenital anomaly registryEUROCATRN-CAR

Rezumat

Anomaliile congenitale sau malformațiile congenitale implică pre­zen­ța unor malformații cu care un individ se naște, conform de­fi­ni­ției Organizației Mondiale a Sănătății. Multe dintre aceste ano­ma­lii au o componentă genetică, iar unele pot fi cauzate de expunerea prenatală la factori teratogeni, putând, de ase­me­nea, avea etiologie multifactorială sau necunoscută. În an­sam­blu, aceste malformații determină modificări structurale, ano­ma­lii funcționale de la ușoare la severe și pot afecta evoluția pe termen lung a fătului și nou-născutului. Malformațiile con­ge­ni­ta­le, structurale sau funcționale, pot avea un impact sem­ni­fi­ca­tiv asupra calității vieții individului, cât și a familiei aces­tu­ia. Planificarea protocoalelor la nivel național realizată de Societatea Română de Obstetrică și Ginecologie, asociată cu in­tro­du­ce­rea testării prenatale universale în ultimii 20 de ani, a per­mis creșterea diagnosticării malformațiilor fetale. Progresul sem­ni­fi­ca­tiv privind stilul de viață, mediul și condițiile materne joa­că, de asemenea, un rol important în prevenirea cu succes a expunerii la teratogeni cunoscuți, recunoscând necesitatea îm­bu­nă­tă­ți­rii metodelor de screening, a aplicării și obiectivelor aces­to­ra. O creștere concomitentă a experienței acumulate în ceea ce privește diagnosticul prenatal, în combinație cu o va­rie­ta­te crescândă de opțiuni de intervenții disponibile la mo­men­tul respectiv, înainte sau după naștere, este, prin urmare, evi­den­tă. Progresul din domeniul tehnologiei ultrasonografice și supraspecializarea personalului medical au permis detectarea ano­ma­lii­lor fetale într-o mare parte din sarcini. Un registru al mal­for­ma­ții­lor congenitale este o bază de date sistematică și cuprinzătoare care colectează, stochează și analizează in­for­ma­ții despre malformațiile congenitale detectate la naștere sau în timpul sarcinii. Un astfel de registru este foarte important și in­clu­de numeroase aspecte esențiale pentru sănătatea publică, cer­ce­ta­rea medicală și îngrijirea pacienților. Registrul va permite iden­ti­fi­ca­rea tendințelor și modelelor în apariția malformațiilor con­ge­ni­ta­le, ajutând la determinarea prevalenței și incidenței aces­to­ra. Identificarea factorilor de risc și a cauzelor potențiale (de exemplu, expuneri la toxine, deficiențe nutriționale) poa­te conduce la implementarea măsurilor de prevenție. De ase­me­nea, poate contribui la planificarea și alocarea resurselor me­di­ca­le și sociale necesare pentru îngrijirea copiilor cu malformații con­ge­ni­ta­le. Pe măsură ce considerăm că Registrul Național al Ano­ma­lii­lor Congenitale din România (RN-CAR) este următorul pas în diagnosticul malformațiilor fetale și în gestionarea ul­te­rioa­ră, prezentăm în această lucrare beneficiile unei baze de date na­țio­na­le, atât pentru pacienți, cât și pentru medici.

Cuvinte Cheie
malformații congenitalebază de dateregistrul anomaliilor congenitaleEUROCATRN-CAR

Introduction

Fetal malformations represent an important public health issue, being associated with a significant burden of morbidity and mortality, both in terms of the afflicted patients and their families, with a significant social and human cost. Congenital malformations are still a source of patient anxiety and concern, despite impressive improvements that have resulted from advances in medical science, including advances in neonatology and pediatric surgery. A thorough understanding of the etiology of these malformations generally allows patients to make informed decisions about whether they should proceed with a corrective operation, bearing in mind the anticipated outcomes and potential problems. Detection of just one fetal malformation requires a thorough diagnostic survey of the entire fetus, as malformations are generally not isolated; they may present as an isolated organ system or structural malformation or may occur concurrently, due to shared development and common growth periods. Statistics derived from congenital anomaly registries are potentially valuable health and management data and can be used in public health inferences such as service delivery, preventive medicine and clinical management of the infant. Congenital anomaly registers are not only a diagnostic instrument, but they have also proved their worth in the field of scientific and clinical research. The registry of congenital anomaly is a program that gathers the causes of congenital defects and malformations observed during pregnancy and in newborn children. The majority of embryonic and fetal development disorders taken one by one have significant low frequencies. From this point of view, these types of malformation fall under the rare diseases category. For this reason, it is important that the registry gathers multidisciplinary and cooperative network in which doctors from hospitals throughout each country, from different areas, participate. The most important objective is to find out the causes and the incidence of alterations in embryonic and fetal development. This is the first step in order to ensure that the development is not altered by establishing public healthcare measures.

In Europe, there are several countries that have developed national registries. These data are gathered and centralized with the help of EUROCAT – European network of population-based registries for the epidemiological surveillance of congenital anomalies. The main EUROCAT objectives are providing essential epidemiological data on congenital anomalies, teratogenic factors early warning, evaluating the primary prevention, and offering information and resources for the population and the healthcare professionals.

In this paper, we would like to discuss the benefits and the practical necessity of a national congenital anomaly registry in our country.

Worldwide registries

Several models of congenital anomalies databases have demonstrated adequate efficiency. They include the technical databases, which provide data for surveillance, studies, evaluation of risk factors, prioritization of policymaking and planning. Some strategies for the sustainable development of the databases have emerged. Surveillance systems are ongoing activities, inherently important to the operation and well-being of national healthcare systems, and serve as demanding hardware for the further upgrading and modernization of healthcare databases. The surveillance databases are the prime source for periodic analyses, evaluation of policy interventions, including demonstration of their achievements or failure, and have value for evidence-informed comprehensive planning for quality of care, production of public health documents, improving health information, facilities for auditing, and public availability of governmental information.

In the United States of America, several states maintain registries of birth defects and fetal anomalies. The database dates from the 1950s. The registry maintained by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) includes data on the 14 million births up to 2003. The accumulated experienced helped those interested in building better models and decision support systems.

The Canadian Enhanced Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (ECASS) database contains information on pregnancies with a diagnosis of fetal anomaly dating from 1999-2010 from seven provinces. Variables recorded in ECASS include maternal and newborn personal identifiers, demographic data, fetal and newborn birth weight, fetal and newborn gestational age, fetal and newborn gender, maternal conditions, pregnancy screening and diagnosis procedures, maternal and fetal diagnosis of infection, pregnancy terminations, pregnancy outcomes, the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations during pregnancy, newborn delivery mode, the newborn’s condition at delivery, temporary codes related to testing, newborn’s conditions at birth and initial hospitalizations, and the vital event and cause of death.

France, the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy are just some of the countries that have consistent anomaly registries that contribute to EUROCAT and adhere to the same purposes (Figure 1). There are elaborated guidelines for data collection, coding and classification. It is strongly encouraged that the data are used for research purposes and epidemiological surveillance.

Figure 1. Countries with data registered in EUROCAT (map generated with Eurostat)
Figure 1. Countries with data registered in EUROCAT (map generated with Eurostat)

Epidemiology and incidence of congenital malformations

Congenital malformations are abnormalities of a structural or functional nature which originate during intrauterine life and can be assessed prenatally, at birth, or at any time during the postnatal period. These can be identified as simple or multiple, not related with a numerical chromosomal anomaly. Of all recognized human congenital anomalies, approximately 20-25% are chromosomal, or with a genetic imprint. Structural abnormalities represent a very heterogeneous group that includes the most serious and numerous CHDs (congenital heart diseases), the CNS (central nervous system) malformations, facial clefts, limb deficiencies, body wall defects, gastrointestinal abnormalities, renal agenesis, severe skeletal malformations, and several well-defined malformations with or without known chromosomal or non-chromosomal syndromes. The International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) defined two types of malformations. Minor or soft malformations are deviations from the normal morphology that have neither functional consequences, nor cause social stigmatization. Major or hard malformations are anomalies that may require surgical correction and may have attendant psychological, social and economic complications(2-7).

In European countries, the overall congenital malformation (CM) incidence ranges from 3 to 4.5 per 100 live births, particularly in Western Europe (4-5 per 100 live births) and in the Mediterranean countries. CMs are the leading cause of perinatal mortality in Europe, especially in Nordic countries, and the second leading cause of infant mortality after premature births. The total mortality related to congenital malformations has not decreased in recent years, because the rate of prenatal diagnosis has no effect on the number of pregnancies with lethal malformations. The trend has been stable over the past 25-30 years because of low rates of voluntary interruptions of pregnancy in the presence of fetal congenital anomalies in Western Europe, except in the Mediterranean countries(8-16).

Figure 2. Number of births with congenital malformations according to European Health Information Gateway(1)
Figure 2. Number of births with congenital malformations according to European Health Information Gateway(1)

Birth defects kill thousands of high-risk neonates each year in developing countries. The babies who are born with congenital anomalies and survive through the first years may have lifelong mental and physical disabilities. This percentage of congenital malformations ranges between 2.13% and 7.26%. Among these, around 25% have metabolic malformations(17-26).

According to World Health Organization (WHO), in Romania there were more than 4000 live births with congenital anomalies in 2022(1).

Figure 3. Number of births with congenital anomalies in Romania in 2022, according to WHO(1)
Figure 3. Number of births with congenital anomalies in Romania in 2022, according to WHO(1)

Benefits and impact of a national registry

The national congenital malformation national registry would enable the provision of important information about congenital malformations at the population level. It would provide information to help understand the prevalence of different pathologies in the community. It would also give a guide to the types and number of services that are needed to be provided for children with different malformations in ordinary community services(26). Also, the turnover of patients with the different congenital anomalies could be calculated using the rate of deaths and the hospital admissions from the data in the registry. As seen in different medical fields, it will provide a uniform etiological classification corelated with the causal factors associated with congenital pathologies at the population level(27). Information gathered from a national registry could estimate and evaluate the impact of health and social service interventions(28). The National Congenital Anomaly Registry can serve as the starting point in all congenital pathologies encountered later in childhood. It could be the infrastructure to communicate between medical centers and to provide childcare for different pathologies in dedicated centers.

A national congenital malformation registry can be established by administrative order. As an alternative, the voluntary participation of all healthcare providers is particularly encouraged(29,30). Patient information is then necessary to review regional, provincial and national rates of remaining physical and/or developmental illness. Accessible information regarding all pathologies is useful. Health professionals are in an excellent position to monitor these malformations over the course of the lifetime of afflicted patients(31-35).

The impact of a registry is both specific (for the population of registrars) and general – for national public health in general. It can be assumed that the electronic congenital malformation registry will have an impact on the international level – on a European and global scale. It should increase the interest of researchers in the quality of the database and further processing and results(36-38). In addition to the indirect benefit for public health in the fields of prevention, genetic research and prenatal diagnosis – influencing national demographic indicators, we can summarize the impact of a central electronic registry of congenital malformations from several perspectives in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Diagram of benefits of the Romanian National Congenital Anomaly Registry (RN-CAR)
Figure 4. Diagram of benefits of the Romanian National Congenital Anomaly Registry (RN-CAR)

 

Ethical and legal considerations

The use of genetic and congenital malformations registries in research, genetic counseling and management decisions involves a range of ethical problems, including those related to accuracy and interpretation of information, informed consent, issues of privacy, confidentiality, intellectual property, and ownership of genetic material, potential misuse and misinterpretation of information, services outside the consensual framework of genetic and congenital malformations services(37,39). The law has a comprehensive impetus to protect human genetics research and practice from an array of antisocial activities. The law imposes responsibilities upon parents, relatives, researchers, other healthcare providers, insurance providers and employers with respect to reproductive genetics and congenital malformations(40-42).

Data privacy and confidentiality have long been central notions in scientific research involving human beings, in which the goal of research often involves the recording and use of personal information in a manner that preserves individual privacy(43). The demands of privacy and research often pull in opposite directions. On one hand, researchers often require information with individually identifying details to calculate incidence rates, analyze demographic trends, and assess disease causation(44,45). In addition, there are compelling ethical obligations to protect people’ privacy and maintain strict confidentiality of any information about individuals obtained during research(46).

Data collection and management

The management of the National Congenital Malformation Registry system involves in the first place the inclusion criteria in the database. This includes all types of prenatal diagnosis, determination of eligible births, or cases of pregnancy termination to be registered. Collaboration of key institutions for data collection, development of data collection sheet and multidisciplinary approach are important for optimal results. The data enquire cannot be made completely anonymous due to the risk of repeated enrolment.

The data will be primarily collected by accessing the registries of hospitals that are willing to enroll the patients. The computer database will be filled after the medical personnel will evaluate the patient’s medical folder available at that moment or will complete with new data the patient’s preexisting file. Additionally, the research team, including the main investigator, regularly monitors the registers on a regular basis. Data quality checks will be carried out by these investigators. To have a complete description of the presented anomalies, the teams will include obstetricians, sonographers, geneticist, neonatologists, pathologist and pediatricians, so there could be a correlation between ultrasound findings, the genetic disorder and (if the case permits) the pathological anatomy elements.

Discussion

The establishment of a National Congenital Malformation Registry has been identified as one of the components of a comprehensive approach to the prevention of congenital malformations(47,48). This registry aims to determine the prevalence of malformations, report rates, trends, types, frequency and areas where a clustering of the problem could be analyzed in detail to affect future public health programs(49-51). The registry could be used to develop an optimum periconceptual care protocol for appropriate safe motherhood, newborn, and childhood care implementation. It also aims to prevent the dreadful consequences of birth defects, such as stigma and discrimination, and the lifetime burden carried by affected persons, families and society(13,52).

Outcome and monitoring of congenital malformations, with and without intervention, help in the following ways: providing service in an optimal way, improving overall health policy activities, and identifying the existing needs of the community(53,54). This information can then help to develop, streamline and implement newer future strategies for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of congenital anomalies. The congenital malformation detection rate can be projected internationally, nationally, regionally and in rural-urban areas(55-58). Additionally, it can provide a cost-effective way of active case finding, managing early diagnosis and treatment at the primary level (for example, tube defects, cleft-lip, anterior meningomyelocele in a neonate), while also improving the available management goal.

There are no public policies providing stipulations aimed at protecting the interests of the child who is likely to be born with congenital malformations. The inclusion of parents’ plans for childbirth based on clinical data about their future child and evaluation of risks has reduced the number of abortions after 22 weeks of gestation or refusal of complications during or after birth by elective indication(59-63). Providing a fetal diagnosis late in pregnancy brings on a social, ethical and medical-juridical impact.

A surveillance system will contribute to informed decision-making, with respect to where to target resources, including the exploration of evolving technology, for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment(64). Equally, where certain policies, such as the addition of harm reduction vaccines for infectious diseases to the National Immunization Program, have been introduced, we are able to provide data that will inform our evaluation of the appropriateness and success of such a change in policy(65). Further data from the EUROCAT register in this specific area have allowed the presentation of more complex information – e.g., the relation between trends in seasonal influenza strains and the occurrence of congenital malformation (such as congenital cataract), pointing towards co-circulating cytotoxic virus strains in infants, and supporting specific interventions in pregnant women(66-68).

A national congenital malformation registry would allow for better resource allocation and planning. It allows for cost estimation for lifelong care requirements of congenitally malformed children and thus enables policy making in resource allocation(69). It allows for the estimation of the need for skilled care required for rehabilitation, including post-surgical complication management(70,71). It may also act as an epidemiological indicator for geographical and temporal patterns, if any, of congenital malformation in the country, permitting corrective action and policy of preventive programs. A national registry would have a strategic role in developing evidence-based simple health policies(72).

There are some difficulties that can be encountered in the development of the national registry. Establishing and maintaining the registry require significant financial, technical and human resources. The challenges that can be encountered refers to ensuring an accurate and complete data collection. This is due to inconsistencies in reporting, underreporting, or lack of standardized diagnostic criteria across different regions. A method to minimize these problems is by evaluating the collected data and secondary processing with unified coding. Collecting sensitive health data can raise privacy concerns. Ensuring data security and obtaining the informed consent from participants will be critical to addressing ethical issues. As evaluated in the SWOT analysis, we consider that the benefits of implementing the RN-CAR surpass the difficulties that may be encountered along the way.

To sum up, we consider that it would be beneficial for the Romanian healthcare system to implement a National Congenital Anomaly Registry that has the following goals:

  • Support an increase in knowledge on the prevalence of specific congenital malformations and the associated mortality in a specific population.
  • Investigate the incidence of different congenital malformations over time, as well as across geographical regions.
  • Investigate the long-term effect congenital malformation may have on the health status of the child.
  • Support the development and funding of further research.
  • Provide evidence to healthcare professionals involved in preconception and prenatal care, where resources should be directed to improve the detection and prevention of a specific congenital malformation.
  • Provide information from our country for the parents who are confronting with anomalies during pregnancy.
  • Generate the infrastructure for additional databases for congenital anomalies that can extent in the pediatric and adult population.

The aim of this paper is to bring awareness among the medical society regarding the usefulness of the Romanian National Congenital Anomaly Registry (RN-CAR) and to collaborate for the benefit of our patients (www.rncar.ro).

 

Autor corespondent: Adrian-Valeriu Neacșu E-mail: adrian-valeriu.neacsu@drd.umfcd.ro

 

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: none declared.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT: none declared.

This work is permanently accessible online free of charge and published under the CC-BY.

 

Bibliografie


  1. https://gateway.euro.who.int/en/  (generated in December 2024)
  2. van Nisselrooij AE, Lugthart MA, Clur SA, et al. The prevalence of genetic diagnoses in fetuses with severe congenital heart defects. Genet Med. 20201;22(7):1206-14. 
  3. Manickam K, McClain MR, Demmer LA, et al. Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021;23(11):2029-37. 
  4. Kagan M, Pleniceanu O, Vivante A. The genetic basis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Pediat Nephrol. 2022;37(10):2231-43.
  5. Rodriguez-Sibaja MJ, Lopez-Diaz AJ, Valdespino-Vazquez MY, et al. Placental pathology lesions: International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology vs. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fetal growth restriction definitions. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024;6(8):101422. 
  6. Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, et al. FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;152(Suppl 1):3-57. 
  7. Duffy JM, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya S, et al. Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study. Human Reprod. 2020;35(12):2735-45. 
  8. Diguisto C, Saucedo M, Kallianidis A, et al. Maternal mortality in eight European countries with enhanced surveillance systems: descriptive population based study. BMJ. 2022;379:e070621. 
  9. Smeenk J, Wyns C, De Geyter C, et al. ART in Europe, 2019: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Human Reprod. 2023;38(12):2321-38. 
  10. Raitio A, Tauriainen A, Syvänen J, et al. Omphalocele in Finland from 1993 to 2014: trends, prevalence, mortality, and associated malformations – a population-based study. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2021;31(02):172-6. 
  11. Politis MD, Bermejo-Sánchez E, Canfield MA, et al. Prevalence and mortality in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicountry study. Ann Epidemiol. 2021;56:61-69.e3 
  12. Kancherla V, Tandaki L, Sundar M, et al. A multicountry analysis of prevalence and mortality among neonates and children with bladder exstrophy. Am J Perinat. 2022;41(9):1143-54.
  13. Morris JK, Wellesley D, Limb E, et al. Prevalence of vascular disruption anomalies and association with young maternal age: A EUROCAT study to compare the United Kingdom with other European countries. Birth Defects Res. 2022;114(20):1417-1426. 
  14. Wehlin L, Ljungman M, Kühlmann‐Berenzon S, et al. Pertussis seroprevalence among adults of reproductive age (20-39 years) in fourteen European countries. Apmis. 2021;129(9):556-65. 
  15. Sliwa K, van der Meer P, Viljoen C, et al. Socio-economic factors determine maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy: a study of the ESC EORP PPCM registry. Int J Cardiol. 2024;398:131596. 
  16. Hnateiko O, Kitsera N, Henyk-Berezovska S, Lukyanenko N, Hruzyntseva N. Assessment of risk factors for development of birth defects among newborns in Lviv region in 2002-2020 (Part 1). Proceeding of the Shevchenko Scientific Society. Medical Sciences. 2022;69(2). https://mspsss.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/741
  17. Heiskanen S, Syvänen J, Helenius I. Increasing prevalence and high risk of associated anomalies in congenital vertebral defects: a population-based study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022;42(5):e538-e543.
  18. Daltveit DS, Klungsøyr K, Engeland A, et al. Cancer risk in individuals with major birth defects: large Nordic population based case-control study among children, adolescents, and adults. BMJ. 2020;371:m4060. 
  19. Farr A, Wachutka E, Bettelheim D, Windsperger K, Farr S. Perinatal outcomes of infants with congenital limb malformations: an observational study from a tertiary referral center in Central Europe. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):35. 
  20. Baqar AM. Neural tube defects and co-occurring anomalies in Europe, 1980-2015. University of Ottawa. 2021. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/items/4c4574c4-e02f-460e-a031-9353716d8454
  21. Tan J, Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, et al. Risk factors for mortality in infancy and childhood in children with major congenital anomalies: A European population‐based cohort study. PaediatPerinat Epidemiol. 2023;37(8):679-90. 
  22. Battino D, Tomson T, Bonizzoni E, et al. Risk of major congenital malformations and exposure to antiseizure medication monotherapy. JAMA Neurol. 2024;81(5):481-9. 
  23. Peelen MJ, Kazemier BM, Ravelli AC, et al. Ethnic differences in the impact of male fetal gender on the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. J Perinatol. 2021;41(9):2165-72. 
  24. Turial S, Stimming F, Lux A, Koehn A, Rissmann A. Prevalence and one-year survival of selected major congenital anomalies in Germany: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Pediat Surg. 2023;33(05):403-13. 
  25. Alanazi AF, Naser AY, Pakan P, Alanazi AF, Alanazi AA, Alsairafi ZK, Alsaleh FM. Trends of hospital admissions due to congenital anomalies in England and Wales between 1999 and 2019: an ecological study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):11808. 
  26. Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, et al. The risk of birth defects with conception by ART. Human Reprod. 2021;36(1):116-29. 
  27. Enewold L, Parsons H, Zhao L, Bott D, Rivera DR, Barrett MJ, Virnig BA, Warren JL. Updated overview of the SEER-Medicare data: enhanced content and applications. JNCI Monographs. 2020;2020(55):3-13. 
  28. Summers KL, Kerut EK, Sheahan CM, Sheahan III MG. Evaluating the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States through a national screening database. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(1):61-8. 
  29. Cardoso-dos-Santos AC, Magalhães VS, Medeiros-de-Souza AC, et al. International collaboration networks for the surveillance of congenital anomalies: a narrative review. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2020;29(4):e2020093.
  30. Ombashi S, van der Goes PA, Versnel SL, Khonsari RH, van der Molen AM. Guidance to develop a multidisciplinary, international, pediatric registry: a systematic review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18(1):296.
  31. Moldenhauer JS, Johnson A, Van Mieghem T. International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis 2022 DEBATE: there should be formal accreditation and ongoing quality assurance/review for units offering fetal therapy that includes public reporting of outcomes. Prenatal Diag. 2023;43(4):411-20. 
  32. Jo HS, Yang M, Ahn SY, Sung SI, Park WS, Jang JH, Chang YS. Optimal protocols and management of clinical and genomic data collection to assist in the early diagnosis and treatment of multiple congenital anomalies. Children. 2023;10(10):1673. 
  33. Latos-Bieleńska A, Materna-Kiryluk A; PRCM Working Group. Polish Registry of Congenital Malformations - aims and organization of the registry monitoring 300,000 births a year. J Appl Genet. 2005;46(4):341-8. 
  34. Bradley EA, Khan A, McNeal DM, et al. Operational and ethical considerations for a national adult congenital heart disease database. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(7):e022338.
  35. Ombelet F, Goossens E, Willems R, et al. Creating the BELgian COngenital heart disease database combining administrative and clinical data (BELCODAC): rationale, design and methodology. Int J Cardiol. 2020;316:72-8. 
  36. Hernández‐Díaz S, Smith LH, Wyszynski DF, Rasmussen SA. First trimester COVID‐19 and the risk of major congenital malformations – International Registry of Coronavirus Exposure in Pregnancy. Birth Defects Res. 2022;114(15):906-14. 
  37. Morris JK, Garne E, Loane M, et al. EUROlinkCAT protocol for a European population-based data linkage study investigating the survival, morbidity and education of children with congenital anomalies. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e047859. 
  38. Glinianaia SV, Morris JK, Best KE, Santoro M, Coi A, Armaroli A, Rankin J. Long-term survival of children born with congenital anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. PLoS Med. 2020;17(9):e1003356. 
  39. Coi A, Santoro M, Pierini A, Rankin J. Survival of children with rare structural congenital anomalies: a multi-registry cohort study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17(1):142.
  40. Holm KG, Neville AJ, Pierini A, et al. The voice of parents of children with a congenital anomaly – A EUROlinkCAT study. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:654883. 
  41. Graf WD, Cohen BH, Kalsner L, Pearl PL, Sarnat HB, Epstein LG, Ethics Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Fetal anomaly diagnosis and termination of pregnancy. Develop Med Child Neurol. 2023;65(7):900-7. 
  42. Esquerda M, Palau F, Lorenzo D, et al. Ethical questions concerning newborn genetic screening. Clin Genet. 2021;99(1):93-8. 
  43. Chaudhry AS, Alajmi BM. Personal information management practices: how scientists find and organize information. Global Knowledge, Memory Communication. 2024;73(6/7):757-74. 
  44. Saglam RB, Nurse JR, Hodges D. Personal information: Perceptions, types and evolution. J Inf Security App. 2022;66:103163. 
  45. Vlasova S. Automated system for recording the results of scientific activity of academic institutions’ employees. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355690032_Automated_System_for_Recording_the_Results_of_Scientific_Activity_of_Academic_Institutions’_employees
  46. Nasution ER, Manurung E. Analysis of government policy on data collection and recording of population documents as an implementation of the principle of legal certainty. W Sci Law Human Rights. 2024;2(02):129-35. 
  47. Melo DG, Sanseverino MT, Schmalfuss TD, Larrandaburu M. Why are birth defects surveillance programs important?. Front Public Health. 2021;9:753342. 
  48. Orioli IM, Dolk H, Lopez‐Camelo J, et al. The Latin American network for congenital malformation surveillance: ReLAMC. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184(4):1078-91. 
  49. Howley MM, Williford E, Agopian AJ, et al. National birth defects prevention study. patterns of multiple congenital anomalies in the National Birth |Defect Prevention Study: challenges and insights. Birth Defects Res. 2023;115(1):43-55. 
  50. Al-Dewik N, Samara M, Younes S, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of major congenital anomalies: A population-based register study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):2198. 
  51. World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Birth defects surveillance: a manual for programme managers. 2014. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548724
  52. Broe A, Damkier P, Pottegård A, Hallas J, Bliddal M. Congenital malformations in Denmark: considerations for the use of Danish health care registries. Clin Epidemiol. 2020:1371-80. 
  53. Bell JC, Baynam G, Bergman JE, et al. Survival of infants born with esophageal atresia among 24 international birth defects surveillance programs. Birth Defects Res. 2021;113(12):945-57. 
  54. Bonnet D. Impacts of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases on outcomes. Transl Pediat. 2021;10(8):2241-9. 
  55. Liu A, Diller GP, Moons P, Daniels CJ, Jenkins KJ, Marelli A. Changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease: effect on outcomes and quality of care in adults. Nature Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(2):126-37.
  56. Verma RP. Evaluation and risk assessment of congenital anomalies in neonates. Children (Basel). 2021;8(10):862.
  57. Li C, Vandersluis S, Holubowich C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of genome-wide sequencing for unexplained developmental disabilities and multiple congenital anomalies. Genet Med. 2021;23(3):451-60. 
  58. Marelli A. Trajectories of care in congenital heart disease – the long arm of disease in the womb. J Intern Med. 2020;288(4):390-9. 
  59. Van Gerwen M, Maggen C, Cardonick E, et al. Association of chemotherapy timing in pregnancy with congenital malformation. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2113180. 
  60. Lalor JG, Sheaf G, Mulligan A, Ohaja M, Clive A, Murphy-Tighe S, Ng ED, Shorey S. Parental experiences with changes in maternity care during the Covid-19 pandemic: a mixed-studies systematic review. Women Birth. 2023;36(2):e203-12. 
  61. Pozniak K, King G, Chambers E, et al. What do parents want from healthcare services? Reports of parents’ experiences with pediatric service delivery for their children with disabilities. Disab Rehab. 2024;46(12):2670-83.
  62. Cortezzo DME, Ellis K, Schlegel A. Perinatal palliative care birth planning as advance care planning. Front Pediatr. 2020:8:556. 
  63. Webb R, Ayers S, Bogaerts A, et al. When birth is not as expected: a systematic review of the impact of a mismatch between expectations and experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):475. 
  64. Ridgway L, Hackworth N, Nicholson JM, McKenna L. Working with families: A systematic scoping review of family-centred care in universal, community-based maternal, child, and family health services. J Child Health Care. 2021;25(2):268-89. 
  65. Çankaya S, Şimşek B. Effects of antenatal education on fear of birth, depression, anxiety, childbirth self-efficacy, and mode of delivery in primiparous pregnant women: A prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Nurs Res. 2021;30(6):818-29.
  66. Peppa M. The safety of influenza vaccination in pregnancy: Examining major congenital malformations as potential adverse outcomes using UK electronic health records. LSHTM Research Online. 2020. https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4658569/ 
  67. Jesudason EC. The epidemiology of birth defects. In: Newborn Surgery. Puri P (Ed), 4th ed. CRC Press. 2020:35-47. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315113968-4/epidemiology-birth-defects-edwin-jesudason
  68. Vendelbo JH, Thunbo MØ, Henriksen TB, Liew Z, Larsen A, Pedersen LH. Evaluating the impact of guidelines for prophylactic aspirin treatment against preeclampsia using ITS analyses. 2023. Abstract from DSTF Annual Meeting 2023. https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/evaluating-the-impact-of-guidelines-for-prophylactic-aspirin-trea-3
  69. Segovia Chacón S, Karlsson P, Cesta CE. Detection of major congenital malformations depends on length of follow‐up in Swedish National Health Register Data: Implications for pharmacoepidemiological research on medication safety in pregnancy. Paediat Perinatal Epidemiol. 2024;38(6):521-31.
  70.  Su Z, Zhang Y, Cai X, et al. Improving long-term care and outcomes of congenital heart disease: fulfilling the promise of a healthy life. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023;7(7):502-18. 
  71. Walani SR, Penny N, Nakku D. The global challenges of surgical congenital anomalies: Evidence, models, and lessons. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2023;32(6):151348.
  72. Grosse SD, Van Vliet G. Challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening: the example of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020;6(4):82.
Articole din ediția curentă

EVENTS

March-May 2025 Calendar

...
GYNECOLOGY

Eficacitatea comparativă a factorului de stimulare a coloniilor granulocitare şi a plasmei bogate în trombocite asupra ratelor de sarcină clinică şi rezultatelor endometriale la femei supuse transferului de embrioni congelați: studiu randomizat clini

Smit B. Solanki
Studiile anterioare care au comparat factorul de sti­mu­la­re a coloniilor granulocitare (GCSF) și plasma bogată în trom­bo­ci­te ...
GYNECOLOGY

Stimularea în faza luteală – un rezumat al literaturii

Corina Gică, Amina Al Battah, Anca Maria Panaitescu, Claudia Mehedințu, Nicolae Gică
Faza luteală începe după ovulație și este caracterizată prin se­cre­ția de progesteron de către corpus luteum, hormon esen­țial pentru pregătirea endometrului în vederea implantării em­brio­nu­lui. Stimularea fazei lutea...
Articole din edițiile anterioare

OBSTETRICS

Măsurarea intervalului atrioventricular în evaluarea cordului fetal – dificultăți în examinarea de rutină

Alexandru Cristian Comănescu, Maria Cristina Comănescu, Agnesa Preda
Tehnicile Doppler sunt instrumente esențiale în evaluarea ne­­in­­v­a­zi­vă a funcției cardiovasculare fetale, în special pen­tru măsurarea intervalului atrioventricular (AV)....
OBSTETRICS

Ce poate ascunde un rezultat NIPT negativ? Mozaicism al trisomiei 18 și anomalii fetale complexe – prezentare de caz

Mihaela Amza, Alexandra-Elena Zamfir, Romina-Marina Sima, Didel-Ionuț Vâlcea, Liana Pleș
Screeningul în primul trimestru este cea mai importantă metodă de depistare a anomaliilor majore fetale. Tes­te­le prenatale neinvazive (NIPT) au fost folosite tot mai frec­vent pentru a evalua anomal...
OBSTETRICS

Caracteristicile ultrasonografice corelate cu aspectele morfopatologice în spina bifida aperta

Anca-Maria Istrate-Ofiţeru, Ana-Maria Cocorăscu, George Lucian Zorilă, Elena-Iuliana-Anamaria Berbecaru, Roxana-Cristina Drăgușin, Cristina-Maria Comănescu, Oana-Iulia Crețu, Marian-Valentin Zorilă, Dominic-Gabriel Iliescu
Scopul acestui studiu a fost de a analiza constatările ecografice detectate în primul și al doilea trimestru de sarcină și de a le...