Complicaţiile perinatale şi neonatale la pacientele cu răspuns ovarian scăzut în sarcinile obţinute prin proceduri de reproducere umană asistată

 Perinatal and neonatal outcome in poor ovarian responders in assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy

First published: 30 septembrie 2020

Editorial Group: MEDICHUB MEDIA

DOI: 10.26416/Gine.29.3.2020.4064


Poor ovarian response in assisted reproductive techniques is defined by an association of clinical features, hormonal markers and ultrasound parameters that have been grouped by ESHRE under the name of Bologna criteria. The incidence of poor ovarian responders among infertile wo­men has been estimated within the range of 9% to 22%. Poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation reflects advanced ovarian aging, which may be associated with early vascular aging. The aim of this research is to iden­tify whether poor perinatal outcomes and pregnancy com­pli­ca­tions are higher among women with poor ovarian response.

controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, poor responders, pregnancy, perinatal complication


Răspunsul ovarian scăzut în reproducerea umană asistată este definit printr-o asociere de caracteristici clinice şi paraclinice, precum markeri hormonali şi parametri imagistici obţinuţi ecografic, care au fost integraţi de ESHRE sub denumirea de criteriile Bologna. Incidenţa răspunsului ovarian slab în rân­dul femeilor infertile a fost estimată în intervalul 9-22%. Răs­pun­sul slab la hiperstimularea ovariană controlată reflectă îm­bă­trânirea ovariană avansată, care poate fi asociată cu îmbătrânirea precoce vasculară. Scopul acestui review este de a identifica dacă rezultatele perinatale slabe şi complicaţiile din sarcină sunt mai frecvente în rândul femeilor cu un răspuns ovarian scăzut.


In vitro fertilization (IVF) technologies with a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation approach have classified patients into three different groups (high ovarian response group, normal ovarian response group, and poor ovarian response group). The poor ovarian response (POR) is used to define a subgroup of patients who have difficulty in the success of IVF procedures, and in literature it has been observed that it varies in incidence between 9% and 22%(1-3).

Poor responders were described for the first time in 1983, as a group of patients who achieved a peak concentration of oestradiol <300 pg/mL, based on a standard stimulation protocol (with 150 IU of human menopausal gonadotrophin), this particular fact leading to a poor follicle production and to a low number of oocytes retrieved and, therefore, to a smaller number of embryos transferred into the uterus(4).

The reproductive aging process is a gradual decrease in both the quantity and the quality of the oocytes and contributes to the gradual decline in fertility and in the final occurrence of natural sterility. Menopause is the final step in the process referred to as ovarian aging. The identification of women who have severely decreased ovarian reserve for their age is relevant and is done by ovarian reserve tests which can be fairly accurate in predicting the response to ovarian stimulation in the assisted reproductive technology (ART) setting. The capacity to predict the chances for spontaneous pregnancy or pregnancy after ART appears very limited.

Since 2011, additional clinical features, hormonal markers and ultrasound parameters have been used under the name of Bologna criteria and, therefore, the ESHRE working group defined as poor responder the subpopulation that gathers two of the following features:

a) advanced maternal age (age ≥40 years old) or any other risk factors for POR;

b) a previous poor ovarian response (≤3 oocytes with a conventional stimulation protocol);

c) an abnormal ovarian reserve test (ORT) – antral follicle count (AFC) <5-7 or anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) <0.5-1.1 ng/ml (<3.6-7.9 nmol/l).

Also, poor responders can be subgrouped based on a retrospective definition (if a patient experienced two episodes of POR after maximal stimulation protocols), or based on a prospective definition as “expected poor responders” (if the patient’s age is over 40 and has an abnormal ORT)(5). The decrease in fertility according to age varies and it is important to note that the chronological age is not always directly proportional to the reproductive potential. Therefore, ORT is a good predictor of ovarian reserve and for the response obtained from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, but not a predictor of the qualitative characteristics of oocytes (implicitly of the success rate of the treatment, obtaining a healthy newborn), and does not reduce the time to obtain a pregnancy through IVF(6).

The main causes for the decrease of the ovarian reserve are represented by the previous ovarian sur­ge­ries (unilateral oophorectomy or cystectomy, for en­do­me­trioma)(7-10), congenital absence of an ovary with or without the absence of the adjacent Fallopian tube (rare event), genetic defects, chemotherapy or radio­the­rapy, autoimmune diseases, chronic smoking, and un­explained(11,12). Also, there have been taken into ac­count new risk factors incriminated for POR, such as type 1 diabetes mellitus(13), transfusion-dependent beta tha­las­semia(14), and the embolization of uterine artery per­formed as treatment for uterine leiomyomas(15,16).

Search procedure 

This review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central and Embase databases from January 2011 until March 2020. The keywords employed and combined for the search strategy were: “in vitro fertilization”, “IVF”, “assisted reproduction”, “as­sis­ted reproduction techniques”, “medical assisted re­pro­duction”, “intracytoplasmic sperm injection”, “ICSI”, “perinatal outcome”, “perinatal complication”, “neo­natal complications”, “poor ovarian reserve”, “ma­ter­nal outcome”, “obstetrical outcome”, “poor ovarian responders”.

The original search returned 598 studies from the three databases. Following the removal of duplicate studies (n=115), all records were screened and full-text was sought and obtained for relevant articles. The relevant articles (n=57) were identified following title and abstract screening, employing the flow chart PRISMA. Citation mining was performed where the reference lists of all included articles and relevant reviews and meta-analyses were reviewed to identify other articles of relevance. The search was limited to full-length manuscripts published in English in peer-reviewed journals up to March 2020. A total of 44 studies were included in the present review.

Only studies that were performed following 2011 were included. As evidenced by the majority of literature, IVF from inception until 2011 reported continuous improvements regarding live birth rates(17). Since 2011, live birth rates have reached a plateau with adjustments reported each year. The population of the study included women undergoing IVF. The primary outcome measure was live birth rate and/or ongoing pregnancy (LB/OP). Both LB and OP were included, as many studies report on different findings and there is a lack of consensus on the desired outcome(18). The aim of our study was to investigate a possible argument for complications caused by pregnancy in patients with POR in IVF procedures.


In the literature, there is growing evidence that sub­fertile patients who conceived after infertility treat­ments have an increased risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications, and this is particularly true for patients who conceived after using high-technology infertility treatments. Moreover, high-technology infertility treat­ments include many concomitant clinical and biological risk factors.

Poor responders after in vitro fertilization (IVF) re­main a challenging group to treat in infertility prac­tice, even though substantial research has been done and va­rious treatment options, such as androgen sup­ple­men­ta­tion, addition of growth hormone and mild sti­mu­la­tion protocols(1,2), have been explored. The live birth rate in poor responders following IVF varies between 9.9% and 23.8%(7,8). This wide variation in live birth rate is due to the different criteria for poor responders in different studies(3-6).

In the poor responder group, there have been no­ticed significantly higher maternal age, FSH serum le­vels and total gonadotrophin amounts compared to the significantly lower AMH serum levels, number of em­bryos transferred and blastocyst stage transfers. AMH was confirmed as an excellent predictor for poor responders and it offers a quantitative evaluation with low inter- and intracycle variability of the ovarian follicles that can’t be assessed by AFC(19-21). In spite of being an excellent predictor for poor responders, AMH – alone or in association with AFC – did not lead to an improved rate of prediction of ongoing pregnancy rates(22).

This category of patients is characterized, in an independent way regarding the therapeutic protocol used(17) and also the patient’s age(18), by cycle cancellation from insufficient response in follicle recruitment and reduced pregnancy rates in comparison with the other categories (normal and high responders)(19). Therefore, it is absolutely necessary to optimize the clinical results in this group of patients by choosing the best COH protocol in order to exploit the potential of whole ovarian reserve and to increase the number of oocytes, not only to predict the ovarian reserve, knowing that at least half of the cancelled IVF cycles were due to poor ovarian response(18).

A very important aspect to be emphasized is the pos­sible link between the POR and the specific risks for this category of patients in terms of pregnancy com­pli­ca­tions.

According to Jirje, the age of the patient is very im­por­tant, therefore advanced maternal age is associated with increased obstetric and perinatal complications. Jirje noticed that women older than 35 years of age who undergo IVF procedures have a greater risk for POR compared to the younger counterparts(35). This fact mostly suggests an ovarian aging and subsequent vascular endothelial dysfunction(36) that determine a greater risk for adverse perinatal outcomes(37).

Romunstad et al. compared pregnancies conceived spontaneously with the ones obtained after subsequent ART but in the same mother, and noticed an increase by three folds in the incidence of placenta praevia in the IVF pregnancy group(19). Also, Deckers et al. noticed a higher incidence of placenta praevia in patients diagnosed with endometriosis who conceived with ART when compared to patients without endometriosis(10). Indeed, compared to pregnancies in the general population, pregnancies obtained by IVF tend to have a 2.7-fold increased risk for preeclampsia, with an incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension in those obtained by IVF between 6.4% and 21% compared to 4% to 5.2% in the spontaneous conception of pregnancy(23-25). However, the main cause is the association of advanced female age with low ovarian reserve and a higher cardiovascular risk(26,27). The failure of uterine vasculature to adapt to the increased hemodynamic demands of pregnancy in women with an adanced age is a proposed explanation.

In their clinical study, Parlakgümüş et al. observed that pregnancy complications in patients with POR did not increase, with approximately two-thirds of them having eventless pregnancies compared to the con­trol group. They also reported that the incidence of pre­eclampsia and gestational diabetes was not increased in patients who had a poor response compared to other preg­nant women of the same age(28).

Most studies indicate similar rates for both pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes(29), as well as for perinatal complications, such as premature birth or low birth weight(30), among women undergoing IVF procedures, regardless of the type of ovarian response.

In a clinical study, it was observed that pregnancy (23.8% versus 41.6%; p<0.01) and subsequent live birth rates (17% versus 29.3%; p<0.001) were significantly lower in poor responders, as multiple pregnancies were represented in a higher number in normal respondents(31). The early aging of the vascular system can lead to low ova­rian reserve(27,28), through a reduced amount of oocytes (often resulting in a poor response) and low oocyte quality(29-31), being reflected in low pregnancy rates and higher abortion rates (possibly due to higher rates of fetal aneuploidy)(32).

The patient’s age is very important, being observed that women over the age of 35 who follow an IVF pro­gram have a higher risk of POR(33), suggesting that ova­rian aging and vascular endothelial dysfunction(34) can determine a higher risk situation for perinatal out-come(35). The patient under the age of 35 classified as a poor responder has a higher pregnancy rate when compared to the older women with the same ovarian reserve (23% versus 12%; p<0.0001)(36); in this case, age offers a better oocyte quality during IVF(37).

In Vasario’s study, the finality of twin pregnancies obtained by IVF is comparable to that of spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies, given the same management criteria regarding gestational age at birth, birth weight, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and malformation rate. The rate of caesarean section was slightly but not significantly higher in IVF pregnancies(38).

Compared to spontaneous twin pregnancy, Nasar and co-workers suggest in their study that artificially ob­tained twins are more prone to caesarean delivery, ha­ving a higher incidence when it comes to premature birth and respiratory complications related to pre­ma­turity, with a prolongation of admission time in in­ten­sive care(39).

In ongoing pregnancies, gestational diabetes, hypertension and placental defects, such as placenta praevia and abruptio placentae, are more common in older women(40). In women >35 years of age who follow IVF procedures, the percentage of POR is higher compared to younger women(37). Therefore, many of the PORs are older women and at high risk of perinatal complications(41). Compared to spontaneously conceived pregnancy, Robert Ochsenkühn et al. observed in a retrospective clinical study on 322 single pregnancies and 78 twin pregnancies that pregnancy-induced hypertension was a more frequently diagnosed complication in the IVF single pregnancy group(42). Also, Healy et al. objectified a higher incidence of placenta praevia in patients diagnosed with endometriosis who conceived with IVF compared to patients without endometriosis. We must keep in mind that, even in the case of a primiparous, where we do not have a previous uterine scar to explain the mechanism of placenta praevia, there is always the possibility of an undiagnosed endometriosis, but also an advanced ma­ter­nal age(43).

As mentioned before, the patient’s age is directly pro­por­tional to the quality of the oocyte. As a result, older wo­men develop increased chromosomal senescence of oocyte genetic material, leading to an increase in the rate of early pregnancy loss, as well as an increased abor­tion rate and fewer ongoing pregnancies(44-50).

It should also be noted that one study showed that there is no difference regarding clinical pregnancy in women older or younger than 40 years old (14.4% versus 13.7%; OR 1.06; CI 95%; 0.63-1.78)(18).

Regarding the mean gestational age (36.35±2.3 versus 36.37±3.04) and the delivery type, these facts appear to have similar rates in both low-response and normal-response patients. Finally, some data highlight the possible role of the Body Mass Index in the reproduction of women, those with poor response and obese having a lower pregnancy rate than those with poor response and normal weight(51,52).

There have been studies in women over the age of 35 who have obtained pregnancies with donated oocytes with excellent results in terms of the risk of perinatal complications. Kenyon et al. compared the pregnancies of women aged >45 years old with pregnancies of those who conceived spontaneously at <36 years old. They reported that mature women over the age of 45 who conceive largely through IVF with donated oocytes can expect similar results to younger women cared for in the same setting of increased obstetrical risk management(53).

In another study, newborns of surrogate mothers had perinatal complications such as premature birth, growth restriction, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes and placenta praevia compared to single-fetal pregnancies conceived spontaneously by the same woman. The data suggest that assisted reproduction procedures may affect the quality of the embryo and that its negative impact cannot be overcome even with a proven uterine environment(54-60).

A prospective study determined the rate of neonatal outcomes, in women who underwent in vitro fertilization and who were 40 years of age or older; birth weight <1,500 g was noticed in 17.16% of cases compared with 5.55% in women who had a spontaneous pregnancy, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions included 22.86% newborns and 8.33% newborns from the control group, respectively(61).

Xu Xiao-Yan et al. investigated the survival quality of infants conceived by in vitro fertilization and identified the factors that caused birth defects and neonatal complications in IVF infants compared with naturally conceived infants. The results showed no significant differences regarding the incidence of birth defects between the two groups (p>0.05); the IVF group had higher incidence rates of low birth weight and neonatal scleroderma (p<0.05), with a longer hospital stay (p<0.01)(62).


A very important aspect to be emphasized is the possible link between the POR and the specific risks for this category of patients in terms of pregnancy complications. The present review aims to answer the question of whether the complications of pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization are greater compared to those obtained spontaneously, and this requires a more in-depth study of the causes and effects.

Most of the studies concluded that decreased ovarian reserve and significant ovarian aging lead to an increased incidence of chromosomal abnormalities and subsequent miscarriages. Perinatal complications are mainly due to age (POR patients tending to be a little older), and less to the fact that women resort to assisted human reproduction techniques.

Regarding the increase in the number of comorbidities (hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, premature births etc.) occurred in pregnancies obtained by IVF, this is a well-known fact, but this number is also increased in surrogate women who have suffered more frequently from these complications rather than in pregnancies obtained spontaneously in the same women, suggesting that the ovarian aging process would have this impact. There is no significant difference in the incidence of birth defects between IVF and naturally conceived infants, but some neonatal complications are more frequent in pregnancies resulted from IVF.

Older women (>40 years of age) may be at an increased risk for abnormalities in the course of labor, perhaps secondary to the physiology of aging, and this require further investigations, because these women seem to be at an increased risk for perinatal mortality, including stillbirth.

Poor responders are associated with significantly lower live birth rates compared to normal responders. However, the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes is not significantly different in both groups. This piece of information is useful for clinicians and women undergoing IVF who are at risk for poor response. There is also a need to further validate these findings by planning larger studies. 


  1. Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D’Anna R, Rienzi L. Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new? Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014: 352098.

  2. Gonda KJ, Domar AD, Gleicher N, Marrs RP. Insights from clinical experience in treating IVF poor responders. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(1):12-9.

  3. Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi N, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FMa. What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(3):155-62.

  4. Coccia ME, F. Rizzello. Poor responders. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;22 (sup 2):S97.

  5. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, ESHRE working group on poor ovarian response definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1616-24.

  6. Guo S, Zhang D, Niu Z, Sun Y. Pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes after pituitary down-regulation in patients with adenomyosis receiving IVF/ICSI and FET. Results of a retrospective cohort study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9:14313-20.

  7. Khine YM, Taniguchi F. Harada T. Clinical management of endometriosis-associated infertility. Reprod Med Biol. 2016;15(4):217–25.

  8. Roustan A, Perrin J, Debals-Gonthier M, Meyer-Lacroix OP, Agostini A, Courbiere B.  Surgical diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy versus idiopathic DOR: comparison of in vitro fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(4):840–7.

  9. Goodman LR, Goldberg JM, Flyckt RL, Gupta M, Harwalker J, Falcone T. Effect of surgery on ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas, endometriosis and controls. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):589.e1-589.e6.

  10. Deckers P, Ribeiro SC, Simões RDS, Miyahara CBDF, Baracat EC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of bipolar electrocoagulation during laparoscopic ovarian endometrioma stripping on ovarian reserve. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(1):11-7.

  11. Rossetti R, Ferrari I, Bonomi M, Persani L. Genetics of primary ovarian insufficiency. Clin Genet. 2017;91(2):183–98. 

  12. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 2012;1148;1152-3.

  13.  Al Khafaji MM, Al-Taee HA, Al-Shaikh SF. Assessment of anti-Mullerian hormone level in reproductive age group women with diabetes mellitus type one. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2017;22(4):269-72. 

  14. Uysal A, Alkan G, Kurtoğlu A, Erol O, Kurtoğlu  E. Diminished ovarian reserve in women with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia major: Is iron gonadotoxic? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:69-73. 

  15. Mensi L, Borroni R, Reschini M, Cassinerio E, Vegetti W, Baldini M, Cappellini MD, Somigliana E. Oocyte quality in women with thalassaemia major: insights from IVF cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;3:100048. 

  16. Kim CW, Shim HS, Jang H, Song YG. The effects of uterine artery embolization on ovarian reserve. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;206:172-6.

  17. Ferraretti AP, Nygren K, Andersen AN, de Mouzon J, Kupka M, Calhaz-Jorge C, Wyns C, Gianaroli L, Goossens V. Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: An analysis of 6 million cycles. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;2017(2):hox012.

  18. Tsikouras P, Manav B, Koukoulib Z, et al. Ovarian reserve after fibroid embolization in premenopausal women. Minimally Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017;26(5):284-91.

  19. Bosch E, Labarta, Kolibianakis E, Rosen M, Meldrum D. Regimen of ovarian stimulation affects oocyte and therefore embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(3):560-70.

  20. Jeve YB, Bhandari HB. Effective treatment protocol for poor ovarian response: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9(2):70–81. 

  21. Zehra J, Syeda SF, Khalid A, Rabia M. Anti-Müllerian hormone: above and beyond conventional ovarian reserve markers. Dis Markers. 2016;2016:5246217. 

  22. Mogili KD, Selliah HY, Chandy A, Kunjummen AT, Kamath MS. Do poor responders have poor perinatal outcomes? A retrospective analysis of 1386 assisted reproductive technology cycles. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2018;23(2):93-7.

  23. Depmann M, Eijkemans MJC, Broer SL, Scheffer GJ, van Rooij IAJ, Laven JSE, Broekmans FJM. Does anti-Müllerian hormone predict menopause in the general population? Results of a prospective ongoing cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1579–87.

  24. Johnston R, Fong A, Sarah Lovell S, Sobolewski PS, Rad S, Turner A. Demographic and obstetric outcomes of pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to non-ART pregnancies. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015;19(1):16-20.

  25. Royster GD IV, Krishnamoorthy K, Csokmay JM, Yauger BJ, Chason RJ, DeCherney AH, Wolff EF, Hill MJ. Are ICSI and high serum estradiol compounding risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes in ART? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):363-70. e3.

  26. Le Ray C, Pelage L, Seco A, Bouvier-Colle MH, Chantry AA, Deneux-Tharaux C, Epimoms Study Group. Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with in vitro fertilisation: a population‐based study. BJOG. 2019;126(8):1033-41.

  27. Tehrani FR, Erfani H, Cheraghi L, Tohidi M, Azizi F. Lipid profiles and ovarian reserve status: a longitudinal study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(11):2522-9.

  28. Parlakgümuş HA, Haydardedeoglu B, Simsek E, Cok T, Yalcinkaya C, Iskender C, et al. Are pregnancy complications increased in poor responders? J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2011;12:1-3.

  29. Yang Y, Sun X, Cui L, Sheng Y, Tang R, Wei D, Qin Y, Li W, Chen ZJ. Younger poor ovarian response women achieved better pregnancy results in the first three IVF cycles. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;32(5):532-7. 

  30. Gat I, AlKudmani B, Wong K, Zohni K, Noga Weizman F, Librach C, Sharma P. Significant correlation between anti-Müllerian hormone and embryo euploidy in a subpopulation of infertile patients. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(5):602-8.

  31. Nelson SM, Klein BM, Arce JC. Comparison of antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(4):923-30. 

  32. Shestakova IG, Radzinsky VE, Khamoshina MB. Occult form of premature ovarian insufficiency. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(sup2):30-2.

  33. Sunkara SK, La Marca A, Seed PT, Khalaf Y. Increased risk of preterm birth and low birth weight with very high number of oocytes following IVF: An analysis of 65,868 singleton live birth outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1473-80.

  34. Tal R, Seifer DB, Wantman E, Baker V, Tal O. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(2):258-65.

  35. Jirge PR. Poor ovarian reserve. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9(2):63-9.

  36. Moreau KL, Ozemek C. Vascular adaptations to habitual exercise in older adults: time for the sex talk. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2017;45(2):116‐23. 

  37. Giri A, Srivastav VR, Suwal A, Tuladhar AS. Advanced maternal age and obstetric outcome. Nepal Med Coll J. 2012;15(2):87-90.

  38. Visario E, Borgarello V, et al. IVF twins have similar obstetric and neonatal outcome as spontaneously conceived twins: a prospective follow-up study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;21:422–8.

  39.  Nassar AH, Usta IM, Rechdan JB, Harb TS, Adra AM, Abu-Musa AA. Pregnancy outcome in spontaneous twins versus twins who were conceived through in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):513-8.

  40. Prysak M, Lorenz RP, Kisly A. Pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women 35 years and older. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:65–70.

  41. Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. for the FASTER consortium. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(5, part 1):983-90.

  42. Ochsenkühn R, Strowitzki T, Gurtner M, Strauss A, Schulze A, Hepp H, Hillemanns P. Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF. Archi Gynecol Obstet. 2003;268:256–61.

  43. Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, Jaques A, Rushford D, Garrett C, Talbot JM, Baker HW. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):265-74.

  44. Iliodromiti S, Anderson RA, Nelson SM. Technical and performance characteristics of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count as biomarkers of ovarian response. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):698-710.

  45. Bozdag G, Polat M, Yarali I, Yarali H. Live birth rates in various subgroups of poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;34(6):639-44.

  46. Kan A, Tilia L, Panlilio E, Venetis C. Is more better? A higher oocyte yield is independently associated with more day-3 euploid embryos. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:i436.

  47. Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi N, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Impact of maternal age on oocyte and embryo competence. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:327.

  48. Pons MC, Carrasco B, Pasrriego M, Boada M et al. Deconstructing the myth of poor prognosis for fast-cleaving embryos on day. Is it time to change the consensus? J Assist Reprod Genetics. 2019;36(sup 1):2299-305.

  49. Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Vaiarelli A, Buffo L, Trabucco E, Ferrero S, Albani E, Rienzi L, Levi Setti PE. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing in women older than 44 years: a multicenter experience. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(5):1173-80. 

  50. Qin Y, Jiao X, Simpson JL, Chen ZJ. Genetics of primary ovarian insufficiency: new developments and opportunities. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):787-808.

  51. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):9-17. 

  52. Duarte C, Florián Joseh D. Resultados en mujeres mayores de 40 años. Rev Peruana de Ginecol Obstet. 2012;58(1):31-4.

  53. Kenyon AP. Effect of age on maternal and fetal outcomes. Brit J Midwifery. 2010;18(6):358-62.

  54. Atsuzawa Y, Lerman A. Endothelial dysfunction and coronary artery disease: assessment, prognosis and treatment. Coron Artery Dis. 2014;25(8):713-24.

  55. Woo I, Hindoyan R, Landay M, et al. Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilization (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):993-8.

  56. Vural F, Vural B, Doğer E, et al. Perifollicular blood flow and its relationship with endometrial vascularity, follicular fluid EG-VEGF, IGF-1, and inhibin-a levels and IVF outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1355–62.

  57. Li RS, Shen XL, Xu F, Shui XJ, Chen YU, Wang WH, Zheng JY. Evaluation of ovarian function using three dimensional ultrasound in perimenopausal women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(12):1059-62. 

  58. Hur YS, Ryu EK, Yoon SH, Lim KS, Lee WD, Lim JH. Comparison of static culture, micro-vibration culture, and micro-vibration culture with co-culture in poor ovarian responders. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016;43(3):146‐51.

  59. Homburg R. General factors influencing ovarian function and the prognosis for ovulation induction. In: Ovulation induction and controlled ovarian stimulation. A practical guide. Springer, Cham. 2014;43-9.

  60. Caillon H, Fréour T, Bach-Ngohou K, Colombel A, Denis MG, Barrière P, Masson D. Effects of female increased body mass index on in vitro fertilization cycles outcome. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2015;9(4):382-8.

  61. Rakic S, Zecevic N, Jankovic-Raznatovic S, Vasiljevic M, Anicic R. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women aged 40 years or older after in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44(2):208-15.

  62. Xu XY, Yang JH, Ma XM, Liu AL, Liu K, He S, et al. Neonatal complications and birth defects in infants conceived by in vitro fertilization. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2015;17(4): 350–5.

Articole din ediţiile anterioare

OBSTETRICĂ | Ediţia 1 19 / 2018

Dorsalgia joasă la gravide şi lăuze. Principii de reabilitare medicală

Iulia Filipescu, Mihai Berteanu, George Alexandru Filipescu, Prof. Dr. Radu Vlădăreanu

Dorsalgia joasă asociată sarcinii reprezintă o patologie im­por­­tan­tă, însă deseori neglijată, care poate avea un potenţial impact negativ asupra...

22 martie 2018
OBSTETRICS | Ediţia 2 32 / 2021

Experienţa noastră în managementul gravidelor infectate cu SARS-CoV-2

Diana Cristina Secară, Ana Veronica Uzunov, Mădălina Daniela Banete, Maria Sajin, Monica Mihaela Cîrstoiu

Infecţia cu SARS-CoV-2 în rândul pacientelor gravide repre­zin­tă o nouă provocare în întreaga lume. Stabilirea unei mo­da­li­tăţi eficiente de a p...

15 aprilie 2021
OBSTETRICS | Ediţia 1 31 / 2021

Actualizare despre utilizarea investigaţiilor radiologice cu raze ionizante în timpul sarcinii: care sunt riscurile fetale?

Dora Boghiţoiu, Violeta Niţescu, Şerban Nastasia, Bianca Danciu, Anca A. Simionescu

Investigaţiile imagistice pot ajuta la diagnosticarea unui spec­tru larg de boli acute sau cronice. Practicianul se poate con­frun­ta cu incertitud...

22 martie 2021

Copiii şi societatea modernă

Daniela Stan, Mihai Mitran

În procesul devenirii şi desăvârşirii de sine, cuplul şi familia sunt calea, mijlocul şi şansa ca matrice fundamentală a vieţii. În şi prin familie...

08 martie 2019