OBSTETRICS

Screeningul diabetului post-partum după diabetul gestațional: alegerea testului și continuitatea îngrijirii – o analiză narativă

Postpartum diabetes screening after gestational diabetes: test selection and continuity of care – a narrative review

Data publicării: 02 Octombrie 2026
Data primire articol: 11 Septembrie 2026
Data acceptare articol: 17 Septembrie 2026
Editorial Group: MEDICHUB MEDIA
10.26416/Gine.53.3.2026
Descarcă pdf

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus identifies women at increased risk of type 2 diabetes, but postpartum screening remains incomplete. This narrative review examines test selection, timing and continuity of care using guidelines and selected diagnostic, intervention and implementation studies. The American Diabetes Association recommends a fasting oral glucose tolerance test with 75 g glucose at 4-12 weeks postpartum; NICE prioritizes fasting plasma glucose at 6-13 weeks. Glycated hemoglobin is less suitable during early postpartum recovery. Testing during the delivery hospitalization can improve completion, although early glucose classification may differ from later testing. Screening therefore requires more than an appropriate laboratory test: responsibility for ordering, reviewing results, communicating findings and arranging subsequent care must be explicit. We propose an unvalidated framework connecting obstetric discharge to continuing metabolic surveillance and prevention. Its value lies in integrating diagnostic coverage, attendance and clinical responsibility; prospective evaluation is needed before it can be considered a validated pathway.

 



Keywords
gestational diabetes mellituspostpartum periodoral glucose tolerance testfasting plasma glucoseglycated hemoglobintype 2 diabetescontinuity of patient care

Rezumat

Diabetul zaharat gestațional identifică pacientele cu risc cres­cut de diabet zaharat de tip 2, însă screeningul post-partum ră­mâ­ne incomplet. Această analiză narativă exa­minează ale­ge­rea tes­tu­lui, momentul testării și con­ti­nui­ta­tea îngrijirii, uti­li­zând ghi­duri și studii selectate pri­vind diagnosticul, in­ter­ven­ții­le și im­ple­men­ta­rea. Ame­ri­can Diabetes Association re­co­man­dă testul oral de toleranță la glucoză cu 75 g la 4-12 săptămâni post-par­tum; NICE prioritizează glicemia plas­ma­ti­că à jeun la 6-13 săptămâni. He­mo­glo­bi­na glicată este mai pu­țin po­tri­vi­tă în perioada post-partum precoce. Testa­rea în cursul spitalizării pentru naș­te­re poate crește par­ti­ci­pa­rea, dar clasificarea metabolică pre­co­ce poate diferi de cea ul­te­rioa­ră. Screeningul presupune res­pon­sa­bi­li­tăți ex­pli­ci­te pen­tru so­li­ci­ta­rea testului, verificarea și co­mu­ni­ca­rea re­zul­ta­tu­lui și or­ga­ni­za­rea urmăririi. Propunem un cadru prac­tic nevalidat care conectează externarea obstetricală cu su­pra­ve­ghe­rea me­tabolică și prevenția pe termen lung. Aces­ta in­te­grea­ză capacitatea diagnostică, participarea la tes­ta­re și res­pon­sa­bi­li­ta­tea clinică. Sunt necesare evaluări pros­pec­ti­ve înainte de utilizarea sa ca traseu clinic validat în prac­ti­ca românească.

Cuvinte Cheie
diabet zaharat gestaționalperioadă post-partumtest oral de toleranță la glucozăglicemie à jeunhemoglobină glicatădiabet zaharat de tip 2continuitatea îngrijirii

Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a marker of future metabolic disease. The 2026 American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards estimate a 50-60% lifetime maternal risk of diabetes after GDM and approximately tenfold higher type 2 diabetes risk than in women without GDM(1). Postpartum screening offers an opportunity to identify persistent dysglycemia and connect women to prevention.

Postpartum glucose screening frequently remains below 50%(2). Recovery, newborn care, fasting, transportation and fragmented responsibility can reduce attendance(3-6). A comprehensive test that is never performed cannot deliver its intended diagnostic benefit.

Materials and method: literature search and evidence selection

This narrative review draws on targeted searches and source checks of PubMed-indexed records, professional-society guidance and publisher websites, updated on 8 September 2026. Search concepts included gestational diabetes, postpartum screening, oral glucose tolerance testing, fasting glucose, HbA1c, inpatient testing and primary care transition. Guidelines, diagnostic studies, trials, systematic reviews and implementation studies were selected for clinical relevance. Selection was purposive, without a registered protocol, duplicate screening or formal risk-of-bias assessment; the review is not exhaustive. Where full text was unavailable, interpretation was restricted to accessible abstracts or source records.

Test selection and timing after gestational diabetes

Professional guidance varies in its balance between diagnostic coverage and feasibility. A review of 26 clinical practice guidelines documented substantial heterogeneity and evidence gaps(7). Table 1 compares major approaches, and Table 2 summarizes test characteristics.

Table 1. Major guideline approaches
Table 1. Major guideline approaches

Table 2. Practical comparison of glycemic tests
Table 2. Practical comparison of glycemic tests

ADA recommends a fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 4-12 weeks postpartum using nonpregnancy criteria. OGTT detects both fasting and post-load abnormalities, being preferred to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), which can be distorted by red-cell turnover, delivery blood loss and preceding pregnancy glycemia(1).

NICE recommends checking glucose before transfer to community care to exclude persistent hyperglycemia. When glucose normalizes after birth, it recommends fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at 6-13 weeks; after 13 weeks, FPG or HbA1c if fasting testing is impractical. Routine OGTT is not recommended(8). This simpler strategy sacrifices some diagnostic coverage.

In a retrospective cohort of 1961 women with GDM, 1090 returned for postpartum OGTT. FPG≥6.1 mmol/L identified 76 of 167 women with impaired two-hour glucose tolerance (sensitivity 45.5%); 91 of 968 women with normal fasting glucose (9.4%) had impaired two-hour glucose tolerance(9). These threshold-dependent findings illustrate what fasting-only testing can miss.

In a national retrospective analysis, 677 of 9118 women with GDM had both postpartum HbA1c and OGTT results; overall correlation with two-hour glucose was weak (r=0.21)(10). Selected participants and heterogeneous timing limit interpretation. HbA1c may provide supplementary information, but it should not be presented as an equivalent early substitute for OGTT(1).

Testing before discharge: benefits
and limitations

The 2024 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) update considers inpatient 75-g OGTT a reasonable alternative to outpatient testing(11). Testing within an existing admission reduces the need for a separate visit and allows results to enter the discharge plan.

A systematic review of seven cohort studies involving 2254 women found lower noncompletion with inpatient testing than with testing at 4-12 weeks, although heterogeneity was substantial(12). Implementation cohorts likewise support the feasibility of inpatient OGTT(13). These observational findings support improved engagement without establishing diagnostic equivalence.

Higher completion does not demonstrate diagnostic equivalence. In a pooled patient-level analysis, a normal immediate OGTT was reassuring for later absence of overt diabetes, but some women changed glucose-tolerance category(14).

Authors’ summary of guidance(1,8,11). ADA – American Diabetes Association; ACOG – American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; FPG – fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c – glycated hemoglobin; OGTT – oral glucose tolerance test.

Authors’ synthesis(1,9,10). FPG – fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c – glycated hemoglobin; OGTT – oral glucose tolerance test.

A 2026 retrospective cohort found that glucose classification varied with testing day and diagnostic criteria(15). Its observational design does not establish a universal optimal inpatient day. Very early results therefore need interpretation in the context of rapidly changing postpartum physiology.

Inpatient testing should be understood as an engagement strategy, while ADA retains 4-12-week OGTT as its reference approach(1). Neither a normal inpatient result, nor a normal later result eliminates the need for continuing surveillance.

Continuity of care: from postpartum testing to long-term prevention

Qualitative studies identify uncertainty about the purpose of testing and incomplete handover between prenatal, obstetric and primary care teams(3,4). These findings support explicit responsibility for the next clinical action.

A network meta-analysis found heterogeneous benefits from education, flexible testing and multimodal strategies(5). Conversely, a primary care electronic reminder trial did not significantly improve screening(6). Reminders may support care coordination, but their effectiveness cannot be assumed in isolation.

A randomized trial of default primary care scheduling plus tailored messages increased visit completion within four months of the estimated due date from 22% to 40%(16). It included several chronic risk groups, so it supports transition design rather than GDM-specific screening efficacy. An enhanced referral pathway and a mother-infant program also reported improved engagement(17,18).

After a normal initial test, ADA recommends lifelong screening every 1-3 years; NICE recommends annual HbA1c testing(1,8). Reminder programs demonstrate feasibility but continuing attrition(19).

Surveillance should lead to prevention. In the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study, lifestyle intervention and metformin reduced diabetes progression among women with previous GDM and impaired glucose tolerance(20). A 2025 meta-analysis estimated a 19% relative reduction with postpartum lifestyle intervention after excluding trials at high risk of bias(21). Another review found low or very low certainty for several self-care outcomes(22). Programs should reflect individual risk and local resources.

Discussion and clinical synthesis

Obstetric teams don’t need to provide lifelong diabetes care. They should make the diagnosis visible, initiate the first assessment and transfer a documented follow-up plan to a clinician who accepts responsibility for prevention.

Limitations include purposive source selection, variable guideline quality, heterogeneous diagnostic timing and criteria, along with context-specific implementation studies(7). No pooled analysis or formal evidence grading was undertaken. Findings from other health systems require local evaluation before application in Romania.

Author-proposed practical pathway (unvalidated synthesis)

This author-proposed pathway synthesizes the evidence discussed above. It has not been prospectively validated, and it is not a professional-society recommendation.

  • Document GDM in the discharge summary and explain the future metabolic risk.
  • Name the clinician responsible for the initial test, choose timing according to the applicable guideline, and arrange testing before discharge where feasible.
  • Assign result review and direct communication to a named clinician or team.
  • Apply nonpregnancy diagnostic criteria, and confirm diabetes when required. A single diabetes-range value without unequivocal hyperglycemia requires confirmation; symptomatic or marked hyperglycemia warrants prompt assessment(1).
  • Transfer the GDM history, test date and result, risk category, surveillance interval and prevention plan to the receiving clinician.
  • Arrange long-term recall, including after normal results, and document who will provide surveillance.

Conclusions

Postpartum screening after gestational diabetes mellitus should connect an appropriate test with reliable result review and continuing prevention. The American Diabetes Association favors OGTT at 4-12 weeks; NICE favors a simpler fasting strategy. Inpatient testing can reduce missed opportunities, but the interpretation requires attention to timing. Clear ownership and documented handover are essential to translate screening into sustained care.

Ethics, consent and data availability: not applicable. This review used published literature and involved no new participants or datasets.

Acknowledgements and generative AI disclosure: OpenAI ChatGPT (GPT-5.6 Sol, as recorded during initial preparation; ChatGPT/Codex for subsequent revision) assisted literature-search organization, drafting, language editing and formatting. No original patient data, experimental results or statistical analyses were generated. The authors retain responsibility for source verification, interpretation and the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.

Financial support: This review received no specific funding.

Author contributions: E.C.M. – conceptualization, methodology, literature search, evidence synthesis, writing–original draft, and project administration. A.M.M. – methodology, interpretation, and writing-review and editing. D.S., R.V.S. and D.N. – methodology, supervision, validation and writing-review and editing. All authors: final approval of the manuscript and accountability for the work.

Corresponding author: Eduard-Cristian Mihoci E-mail: eduard_mihoci@yahoo.com

Conflict of interests: none declared.

Financial support: none declared.

This work is permanently accessible online free of charge and published under the CC-BY.

Bibliografie


  1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes. 15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. Diabetes Care. 2026;49(Suppl 1):S321-S338.
  2. Bauer ST, Cate JJM, Whitsel AI, Combs CA. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Quality metric on the rate of postpartum diabetes screening after pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(4):B2-B9.
  3. Cronin A, Noctor E, O’Doherty D, Bowers S, Byrne E, Cremona A. Facilitators and barriers to attending postpartum screening in women with a recent pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study. Public Health. 2023;220:99-107.
  4. Sushko K, Racey M, Sherifali D, et al. Integrating the primary care perspective in the implementation of a diabetes prevention program for patients with recent gestational diabetes: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Prim Care. 2026;27(1):297.
  5. Huang J, Forde R, Parsons J, et al. Interventions to increase the uptake of postpartum diabetes screening among women with previous gestational diabetes: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(10):101137.
  6. Zera CA, Bates DW, Stuebe AM, Ecker JL, Seely EW. Diabetes Screening Reminder for Women with Prior Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):109-114.
  7. Ohene-Agyei P, Iqbal A, Harding JE, Crowther CA, Lin L. Postnatal care after gestational diabetes - a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):720.
  8. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. NICE guideline NG3. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3. Accessed: 2026 Sept 8.
  9. Kapaya H, May L, Jacques R, Madhuvrata P. Sensitivity of postnatal fasting plasma glucose in identifying impaired glucose tolerance in women with gestational diabetes – 25 years’ data. Obstet Med. 2017;10(3):125-131.
  10. Cohen N, Toledano Y, Shafir M, Lavie O, Zilberlicht A. Evaluation of postpartum dysglycemia by serum glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a national data analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;310(6):3029-3035.
  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Screening for Gestational and Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy and Postpartum: ACOG Clinical Practice Update. Obstet Gynecol. 2024;144(1):e20-e23.
  12. Ciomperlik H, Harper M, Hossain MF, Turrentine MA. Administration of the Postpartum Glucose Tolerance Test During the Delivery Hospitalization Compared with 4-12 Weeks Postpartum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. O G Open. 2024;1(3):33.
  13. Ayala NK, Fain AC, Smith MM, Schlichting LE, Hamel MS, Werner EF. Implementation of In-Hospital Postpartum Glucose Tolerance Testing for People with Gestational Diabetes. Am J Perinatol. 2024;41(8):969-974.
  14. Waters TP, Kim SY, Werner E, et al. Should women with gestational diabetes be screened at delivery hospitalization for type 2 diabetes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(1):73.e1-73.e11.
  15. Bastian IN, Gandhi M, Turrentine MA. Evaluation of Postpartum Glucose Tolerance Test Results Based on Criteria and Timing. Obstet Gynecol. 2026;148(1):4-10.
  16. Clapp MA, Ray A, Liang P, James KE, Ganguli I, Cohen JL. Postpartum Primary Care Engagement Using Default Scheduling and Tailored Messaging: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(7):e2422500.
  17. Cameron NA, Birdsell H, Niznik CM, et al. An Enhanced Postpartum Transition Program to Primary Care. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024;33(10):1417-1422.
  18. Bose Brill S, May S, Lorenz AM, et al. Mother-Infant Dyad program in primary care: evidence-based postpartum care following gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):9336-9341.
  19. Bochanen N, Verstraete S, Laenen A, et al. Long-term effectiveness of a reminder system for postpartum glucose intolerance screening in gestational diabetes. Acta Diabetol. Published online July 30, 2026.
  20. Aroda VR, Christophi CA, Edelstein SL, et al. The effect of lifestyle intervention and metformin on preventing or delaying diabetes among women with and without gestational diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study 10-year follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(4):1646-53.
  21. Bracco PA, Reichelt AJ, Alves LF, et al. Lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes after a pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis update. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025;17(1):66.
  22. Katsuragawa S, Mai T, McDougall ARA, Romero L, Vogel JP, Makama M. Effectiveness of self-care interventions for the prevention of type 2 diabetes among women with previous gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2025;7(9):101731.
Articole din ediția curentă

EVENTS

October-December 2026 Calendar

The 11th EFC (European Federation for Colposcopy) Congress 2026...
NEONATOLOGY

Alăptarea în unitatea de terapie intensivă neonatală: beneficii materne, provocări neonatale și rolul abordării pluridisciplinare

Diana-Iulia Vasilescu, Laura-Andreea Ştefan, Adriana-Mihaela Dan, Oana Bodean, Sorin-Liviu Vasilescu, Monica-Mihaela Cîrstoiu
Human milk is a dynamic biological system whose composition changes according to maternal physiology, gestational age, lactation s...
NEONATOLOGY

Afectarea sistemului nervos central în sepsisul cu debut precoce cu Candida parapsilosis la un nou-născut prematur: prezentare de caz și revizuire a literaturii

Cătălina Maravela, Simona Vlădăreanu, Simona-Daniela Popescu, Alexandra-Elena Popa, Miruna-Mihaela Rotar, Maria-Irina Vlădăreanu
Candida parapsilosis is an important cause of invasive candidiasis in preterm neonates, particularly in those exposed to central v...
Articole din edițiile anterioare

OBSTETRICS

A rare case of complete hydatidiform mole with prolonged evolution – clinical case

Mona Akad, Răzvan Socolov, Raluca Bălan, Diana Popovici, Eduard Crauciuc, Roxana Covali, Fawzy Akad, Tudor Buţureanu, Ana-Maria Apetrei, Alina Andriucă, Demetra Socolov
Mola hidatiformă, cunoscută drept sarcină molară, reprezintă o boală gestaţională trofoblastică cu punct de plecare placentar şi c...
OBSTETRICS

Dificultăţi de examinare ecografică la gravidele supraponderale. Studiu retrospectiv şi analiza literaturii

Răzvan Socolov, Mona Akad, Roxana Covali, Ioana Shadye-Scripcariu, Demetra Socolov, Dragoş Crauciuc, Eduard Crauciuc, Fawzy Akad, Diana Popovici, Roxana Gireadă
Introducere. În ultimele decenii, sistemul medical se confruntă tot mai des cu paciente obeze sau supraponderale. Obezitatea este ...
EDITORIAL

„Tradiţie şi inovaţie” „Diversitate şi calitate”

Demetra Socolov
Cu aceste două motouri în minte, am organizat Conferinţa Zilele Medicale „Vasile Dobrovici”, ediţia a 15-a, online, între 26 şi 28 noiembrie 2020....