Factorii nutriţionali și ai stilului de viaţă asociaţi cu rezistenţa la insulină la adulţii tineri – rezultatele unui studiu transversal
Nutritional and lifestyle factors associated with insulin resistance in young adults – findings from a cross-sectional study
Data primire articol: 13 Iulie 2026
Data acceptare articol: 21 Iulie 2026
Editorial Group: MEDICHUB MEDIA
10.26416/JourNutri.11.3.2026.11799
Descarcă pdf
Abstract
Background/objective. Insulin resistance is a metabolic disorder with increasing prevalence among young adults, closely linked to modern lifestyle patterns and genetic predisposition. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between dietary habits, anthropometric parameters, sleep quality, physical activity level, genetic factors and the risk of insulin resistance among young adults.
Materials and method. A cross-sectional study was conducted, using a structured 30-item online questionnaire, for the Romanian general population, in 2026. The final sample comprised 191 participants (77% female), between 18 and 35 years old. Data were collected on anthropometric measures, dietary habits, physical activity, sleep quality, symptoms suggestive of insulin resistance and family history. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests (significance threshold: p<0.05).
Results. Four statistically significant associations were identified. Participants with obesity most frequently reported a history of elevated blood glucose (44.4%; p=0.001). A family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with elevated blood glucose (p=0.030). A disorganized dietary pattern was associated with irregular meal timing (p<0.001), and frequent postprandial hunger significantly co-occurred with post-meal fatigue (p=0.001), symptoms suggestive of the glycemic fluctuations that are characteristic of subclinical insulin resistance.
Conclusions. Genetic and behavioral factors, particularly obesity and dietary disorganization, contribute to the early onset of glucose metabolic dysfunction in young adults. The 18-35 years old age range represents a key window for preventive intervention, with real potential to reduce the long-term incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Keywords
insulin resistanceyoung adultsdietary habitsBody Mass Indextype 2 diabetes mellituslifestylemetabolic screeningRezumat
Introducere/obiectiv. Rezistenţa la insulină este o tulburare metabolică ce are o prevalenţă crescută în rândul tinerilor adulţi, strâns corelată cu stilul de viaţă modern și predispoziţia genetică. Studiul de faţă și-a propus evaluarea asocierilor dintre obiceiurile alimentare, parametrii antropometrici, calitatea somnului, nivelul de activitate fizică, factorii genetici și riscul de rezistenţă la insulină la un lot de adulţi tineri.
Materiale și metodă. A fost realizat un studiu transversal, bazat pe un chestionar structurat cu 30 de întrebări, distribuit online, în 2026, către populaţia generală din România. Eșantionul final a cuprins 191 de participanţi (77% femei), cu vârste între 18 și 35 de ani. Au fost colectate date antropometrice, privind obiceiurile alimentare, calitatea somnului, activitatea fizică, simptomatologia sugestivă pentru rezistenţa la insulină și antecedentele heredocolaterale. Analiza statistică a inclus statistică descriptivă și teste Chi-pătrat.
Rezultate. Au fost identificate patru asocieri semnificative statistic. Participanţii cu obezitate au raportat cel mai frecvent un istoric de glicemie crescută (44,4%; p=0,001). Prezenţa antecedentelor heredocolaterale de diabet zaharat de tip 2 s-a asociat semnificativ cu glicemia crescută (p=0,030). Tiparul alimentar dezorganizat a fost asociat cu mesele la ore neregulate (p<0,001), iar foamea postprandială frecventă a coexistat semnificativ cu oboseala după mese (p=0,001), simptome sugestive pentru fluctuaţii glicemice caracteristice rezistenţei la insulină subclinice.
Concluzii. Factorii genetici și comportamentali, în special obezitatea și dezorganizarea alimentară, contribuie la apariţia precoce a disfuncţiei metabolice glucidice la tinerii adulţi. Intervalul 18-35 de ani reprezintă un moment-cheie pentru intervenţia preventivă, cu potenţial real de reducere a incidenţei diabetului zaharat de tip 2 pe termen lung.
Cuvinte Cheie
rezistenţă la insulinăadulţi tineriobiceiuri alimentareindice de masă corporalădiabet zaharat de tip 2stil de viaţăscreening metabolicIntroduction
Insulin resistance is one of the most prevalent metabolic disorders of the 21st century, defined as the diminished response of peripheral tissues, particularly skeletal muscle, liver and adipose tissue to insulin action, with the direct consequence of compensatory pancreatic hypersecretion and hyperinsulinemia(1). This metabolic dysfunction constitutes a central link in the progression toward type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, atherogenic dyslipidemia and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
While insulin resistance was traditionally associated predominantly with older populations or individuals with obesity, recent epidemiological data significantly shift this perspective. Parcha et al. demonstrated that approximately 40% of American adults aged 18 to 44 years old exhibit insulin resistance, with half of them having a Body Mass Index (BMI) within the normal range(2). These figures underscore that insulin resistance is a common subclinical condition among young adults, often unrecognized in the absence of active metabolic screening.
Modern lifestyle plays a determining role in the onset and progression of insulin resistance. Frequent consumption of high glycemic index carbohydrates generates repeated glycemic fluctuations, which overburden pancreatic insulin secretion and progressively reduce insulin receptor sensitivity(3). Sedentary behavior, insufficient or poor-quality sleep and chronologically disorganized meals are additional factors that disrupt glucose homeostasis through distinct hormonal and circadian mechanisms(1,4,5).
Early identification of modifiable risk factors for insulin resistance among young adults represents a public health priority, given that lifestyle interventions can significantly prevent or delay progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus and its cardiometabolic complications(1,2).
In this context, the present study aimed to evaluate the associations between dietary habits, physical activity level, sleep quality and anthropometric markers of metabolic risk in a sample of young adults aged 18 to 35 years old.
Materials and method
Study design
The study followed a cross-sectional design, made in 2026, based on data collection through a structured online questionnaire comprising 30 items. The variables analyzed included anthropometric data, dietary habits (including consumption of high glycemic index foods, meal regularity, and eating speed), symptoms suggestive of glycemic fluctuations, sleep quality, physical activity level and family history.
Study population and eligibility criteria
The study included 191 Romanian participants aged between 18 and 35 years old, recruited through the online distribution of the questionnaire. Inclusion criteria comprised: age within the target range, informed consent to participate and complete questionnaire completion, including the provision of essential anthropometric data (weight, height). Incomplete questionnaires, those with inconsistent responses, or those lacking anthropometric data were excluded.
The gender distribution revealed a predominance of female participants (77%) compared to male participants (23%). This uneven distribution reflected a well-documented trend in online health-related questionnaire studies, in which women participate more frequently.
Anthropometric indicators
Body Mass Index was calculated using the standard formula: BMI = weight (kg)/height2 (m2). Based on BMI values, the participants were classified according to World Health Organization criteria as: normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) and obese (BMI≥30 kg/m2). Waist circumference was used as an additional marker of central obesity, recognized as an independent predictor of insulin resistance.
Statistical analysis
Collected data were compiled and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods (means, standard deviations, frequencies, percentages) and inferential tests. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using the Chi-square test, with the statistical significance threshold set at p
Results
General characteristics of the study population
Out of the 191 participants included in the analysis, 50.8% were under 25 years of age, 42.4% were 25-29 years old, and 6.8% were 30-35 years old. The distribution by BMI category showed that 62.3% of participants were of normal weight, 25.1% were overweight, and 12.6% were obese, meaning that 37.7% of the sample exceeded normal weight, a proportion directly relevant to the analysis of metabolic risk (Figure 1).

Association between BMI and history of elevated blood glucose (p=0.001)
A statistically significant association was identified between BMI category and history of elevated blood glucose (χ2; p=0.001). Participants with obesity most frequently reported a prior episode of elevated blood glucose (44.4%), compared to those who were overweight (22.2%) and of normal weight (33.3%). These data confirm that obesity as an independent risk factor for impaired glucose metabolism in young adults (Figure 2).

Association between family history of type 2 diabetes and elevated blood glucose
The presence of a family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with a personal history of elevated blood glucose (χ2; p=0.030). Respondents with first-degree relatives with type 2 diabetes mellitus reported a prior episode of elevated blood glucose in 66.7% of cases, compared to 33.3% among those without a positive family history. This association confirms the role of genetic predisposition as a non-modifiable risk factor, with direct implications for the need for early metabolic screening (Figure 3).

Association between dietary pattern and irregular meal timing
The frequency of irregularly timed meals revealed a highly significant association with the overall dietary pattern (χ2; p<0.001). Participants whose diet was predominantly based on processed and fast food reported eating at irregular hours daily in 58.3% of cases, compared to 9.9% among those with a balanced diet. Day-to-day variable eating patterns were correlated with frequent irregular meals (63.3%), suggesting that dietary disorganization has a direct impact on glycemic rhythm (Figure 4).

Association between postprandial hunger and post-meal fatigue
A statistically significant association was identified between the presence of postprandial drowsiness/fatigue and feeling hungry shortly after eating (χ2; p=0.001). Among participants reporting frequent postprandial hunger, 61.7% also experienced constant post-meal fatigue, compared to 31.9% of those who did not report postprandial hunger. The co-occurrence of these two symptoms signals possible postprandial glycemic fluctuations, a compensatory mechanism characteristic of the hyperinsulinism seen in subclinical insulin resistance (Figure 5).

Additionally, descriptive analysis revealed that 52.3% of participants spend more than six hours per day in a sedentary position, and 52.3% reported fluctuating or poor sleep quality. Although these factors did not reach statistical significance in the associations tested, likely due to design limitations, they remain relevant in the context of international literature and are discussed in the following section.
Discussion
Interpretation of results in pathogenic context
The four significant associations identified in this study are consistent with the known pathogenic mechanisms of insulin resistance and with trends documented in international literature.
The first association, obesity and elevated blood glucose (p=0.001), is supported by the molecular mechanisms through which visceral adipose tissue drives hypersecretion of proinflammatory adipokines, mitochondrial oxidative stress and insulin receptor dysfunction(1). The current data align with the trend documented by Parcha et al. (2022), who demonstrated that insulin resistance affects approximately 40% of American young adults, including 50% with normal BMI, an observation consistent with the 33.3% rate of elevated blood glucose episodes reported by normal-weight participants in our study(2).
The second association, family history of type 2 diabetes and elevated blood glucose (p=0.030), confirms the amplification of genetic susceptibility by environmental factors. Genetic predisposition acts through a reduced number or affinity of insulin receptors, polymorphisms in intracellular signaling pathways and altered pancreatic beta-cell function, mechanisms documented in recent pathogenic reviews(1).
The third association, disorganized dietary pattern and irregular meal timing (p<0.001), adds a chronobiological dimension to the analysis. Santos-Báez et al. (2024) demonstrated, through continuous glucose monitoring, that time of day, meal composition and meal regularity significantly affect postprandial glycemic variability(6). Ali et al. (2023) confirmed, in a nationally representative US sample, that meal timing and eating-window duration independently influence fasting glucose and insulin levels, regardless of dietary composition(4). Nakamura et al. (2024) documented that late dinner (after 9:00 PM) significantly raises postprandial glucose and prolongs the insulin response, even in healthy young adults(7); in our sample, 18.8% reported eating dinner after 9:00 PM, placing this cohort in the risk category described.
The fourth association, postprandial hunger and post-meal fatigue (p=0.001), has clinical relevance due to its semiotic value. The coexistence of these two symptoms suggests postprandial reactive hypoglycemia or wide glycemic variability, mechanisms characteristic of compensatory hyperinsulinism. Park et al. (2025) showed that similar behavioral patterns are associated with metabolic subphenotypes that precede type 2 diabetes by years before diagnosis, underscoring the importance of early recognition of these symptoms at the subclinical stage(8).
Sedentary behavior and sleep factors of epidemiological relevance
Although sedentary behavior and sleep quality did not reach statistical significance in the associations tested, the descriptive data from this study are concerning: 52.3% of participants spend more than six hours per day in a static position, and 9.4% sleep less than six hours per night.
Cavallo et al. (2022), in a meta-analysis of 45 studies, concluded that sedentary behavior is consistently and negatively associated with insulin sensitivity and the incidence of type 2 diabetes(9). Gupta et al. (2026) quantified that more than 8-10 hours of daily sedentary time increases the odds of insulin resistance by 33% (OR 1.33; 95% CI; 1.12-1.57)(10). The lack of statistical significance in the present study may be explained by the limited statistical power of the subgroups and by the self-reported nature of the data, which frequently underestimates actual sedentary behavior.
Regarding sleep, Singh et al. (2022) documented that short sleep duration disrupts several biological mechanisms relevant to glucose metabolism: increased inflammatory markers, decreased GLP-1 secretion and circadian misalignment(5). Pinheiro et al. (2025) further note that sleep deprivation causes a 15-30% increase in circulating free fatty acids overnight, with a direct effect of reducing insulin sensitivity(11).
Contribution of carbohydrate quality
Although no statistically significant association was found between consumption of high glycemic index carbohydrates and anthropometric or glycemic parameters, the specialized literature indicates a real effect. Yu et al. (2025), in a meta-analysis of adults without diagnosed diabetes, demonstrated that increased frequency of high glycemic index carbohydrate consumption is independently associated with higher HOMA-IR values(3). The lack of significance in our sample may be explained by the self-reported nature of the data and by the small subgroup of participants whose diet was predominantly based on processed foods (n=12), insufficient for robust statistical testing.
Study limitations
The first fundamental limitation relates to the cross-sectional design: capturing a single point in time, it does not allow for the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships, and the temporal order of events remains unknown.
A second limitation arises from the exclusive use of self-reported data, which is subject to social desirability bias and recall errors. The absence of any objective biological measurement, HOMA-IR, fasting blood glucose or oral glucose tolerance test makes clinical confirmation of insulin resistance among participants impossible.
The sample comprised 77% women, recruited predominantly through social media, favoring individuals with access to technology and higher educational attainment, thereby limiting representativeness and the generalizability of the results. The subgroup with a diet based on processed foods and fast food (n=12) was insufficient for robust statistical estimates.
Conclusions
The results of this study confirm that insulin resistance is not the exclusive domain of middle age or individuals with obesity; it is also present among apparently healthy young adults, often in the absence of an explicit diagnosis. The four statistically significant associations identified, obesity and elevated blood glucose (p=0.001), family history of type 2 diabetes and elevated blood glucose (p=0.030), disorganized dietary pattern and irregular meals (p<0.001), and frequent postprandial hunger and post-meal fatigue (p=0.001) outline a multifactorial risk profile in which genetic factors overlap with maladaptive dietary behaviors and chronotypes.
The 18-35 years old age range represents a window of opportunity for preventive intervention: dietary habits are not yet firmly established, and lifestyle changes can significantly prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Future studies should incorporate objective biological measurements (HOMA-IR, fasting blood glucose), a longitudinal design and more representative samples in terms of gender distribution and socioeconomic background.
Conflict of interests: none declared.
Financial support: none declared.
This work is permanently accessible online free of charge and published under the CC-BY.
Bibliografie
- Lee S, Park S, Choi C. Insulin Resistance: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies. Diabetes Metab J. 2022;46(1):15-37.
- Parcha V, Heindl B, Kalra R, et al. Insulin Resistance and Cardiometabolic Risk Profile Among Nondiabetic American Young Adults: Insights From NHANES.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(1):e25-e37. - Yu Y, Fu Y, Chen Y, Fang Y, Tsai M. Effect of dietary glycemic index on insulin resistance in adults without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nutr. 2025;12:1458353.
- Ali M, Reutrakul S, Petersen G, Knutson K. Associations between Timing and Duration of Eating and Glucose Metabolism: A Nationally Representative Study in the U.S. Nutrients. 2023;15(3):729.
- Singh T, Ahmed TH, Mohamed N, et al. Does Insufficient Sleep Increase the Risk of Developing Insulin Resistance: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23501.
- Santos-Báez L, Díaz-Rizzolo D, Popp C, et al. Diet and Meal Pattern Determinants of Glucose Levels and Variability in Adults with and without Prediabetes or Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study. Nutrients. 2024;16(9):1295.
- Nakamura F, Shimba Y, Toyonaga S, et al. Delayed dinnertime impairs glucose tolerance in healthy young adults. J Diabetes Investig. 2024;15(2):172-176.
- Park H, Metwally AA, Delfarah A, et al. High-resolution lifestyle profiling and metabolic subphenotypes of type 2 diabetes. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8(1):352.
- Cavallo FR, Golden C, Pearson-Stuttard J, Falconer C, Toumazou C. The association between sedentary behaviour, physical activity and type 2 diabetes markers: A systematic review of mixed analytic approaches. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0268289.
- Gupta S, Dubey E, Wadhwani R, Malik AI. Association between sedentary lifestyle and insulin resistance in urban adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Med Pharm Res. 2026;7(1): 2106-2113.
- Pinheiro MC, Costa HE, Mariana M, Cairrao E. Sleep Deprivation and Its Impact on Insulin Resistance. Endocrines. 2025;6(4):49.
