REVIEW ARTICLES

Microangiopatii trombotice (PE/HELLP, PTT, aSHU). Diagnosticul diferenţial: date clinice şi de laborator

 Thrombotic microangiopathies (PE/HELLP, TTP, aHUS). Differential diagnosis: clinical and laboratory features

First published: 24 mai 2022

Editorial Group: MEDICHUB MEDIA

DOI: 10.26416/ObsGin.70.1.2022.6507

Abstract

The causes of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), identified during pregnancy, are varied: pregnancy-specific and not specific. The differentiation between a severe preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) may be challenging but is critical to ensure the correct management of the pregnant patient as well for future pregnancies, and to institute promptly the treatment, as these are acute conditions with significant morbidity and mortality in untreated patients.

Keywords
preeclampsia (PE), HELLP, thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), thrombocytopenias, pregnancy 

Rezumat

Cauzele microangiopatiei trombotice identificate în timpul sarcini sunt variate: specifice sarcinii şi nespecifice. Diferenţierea preeclampsiei de formă severă sau a sindromului HELLP (anemie hemolitică, enzime hepatice crescute, număr scăzut de trombocite) de purpura trombotică trombocitopenică (PTT) sau de sindromul hemolitic-uremic atipic (aSHU) poate fi dificilă, dar este esenţială pentru a asigura o gestionare corectă a impactului asupra evoluţiei pacientei gravide, pentru sarcinile viitoare şi pentru instituirea tratamentului cu promptitudine, deoarece acestea sunt afecţiuni acute cu morbiditate şi mortalitate semnificative la pacientele netratate.

Introduction

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) represents a serious pathological condition, characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), thrombocytopenia and various organ dysfunctions(1), which refers to a pattern of endothelial cell injury of variable severity that preferentially affects the central nervous system (altered consciousness, seizures), the kidneys (acute kidney injury [AKI]), and the heart (raised serum troponin level, ischemia, sudden death)(2). Acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) was almost universally fatal until the introduction of plasma therapy, which improved the survival from below 10% to 80-90%. Patients who survive an acute episode are at high risk of relapse and of long-term morbidity(3).

Pregnant patients most often present with symptoms of severe preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome (e.g., hypertension, upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, malaise, neurological complications/eclampsia)(1,4) but, rarely, TMA is due to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) or to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Due to overlapping clinical and laboratory features, TTP and aHUS are often mistaken for preeclampsia or HELLP(4). Taking into consideration that the etiology of maternal TMAs is diverse during pregnancy, and that it could have severe maternal and fetal complications, this review outlines the differential diagnosis of pregnancy-associated microangiopathic conditions, with a focus on the distinction between TTP, aHUS and severe preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome, in order to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments.

Pregnancy-specific TMAs: preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome

Preeclampsia (PE), a disorder that complicates 2-8% of pregnancies, is a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Especially the early-onset PE (i.e., PE requiring delivery before 34 weeks of gestation) is associated with an increased risk of both short- and long-term maternal complications and perinatal mortality and morbidity(5). Impaired placentation with abnormal blood-flow velocity and resistance in placental vessels(6), endothelial dysfunction, abnormal angiogenesis, and exaggerated inflammatory response with resultant generalized vasospasm, activation of platelets and abnormal hemostasis(7) are associated with preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction(6,7).

The individual risk of pregnant patients for developing preeclampsia is calculated based on parameters such as maternal characteristics, sonographic measurements, physiological markers and biochemical determination of maternal serum markers. The screening test for the first trimester should be a combination of maternal risk factors, measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum placental growth factor (PLGF), maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), and uterine artery pulsatility index (UTPI)(8). In pregnancies that develop PE, the values of uterine artery pulsatility index and MAP are increased and the values of serum PAPP-A and PlGF are decreased(9).

The clinical application of first-trimester screening is the identification of patients at high risk for PE, and could potentially improve the pregnancy outcome using low-dose aspirin before 16 weeks of pregnancy, by improving placentation, with a beneficial effect particularly on the risks of early-onset compared with late-onset preeclampsia(6,10). The initiation of aspirin treatment is recommended, at the earliest, at 12weeks of gestation in women with risk factors(6).

Preeclampsia was defined in accordance with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as systolic blood pressure (BP)≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP≥90 mm Hg on at least two occasions measured 4 hours apart, developing from 20 weeks of gestation onward in previously normotensive women and proteinuria ≥300 mg in a 24-hour urine specimen. In the absence of proteinuria, it is considered the new onset of hypertension with new onset of any of the following: thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100×109/L), renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.1 mg/dL or doubling of the baseline creatinine in the absence of other renal disease), impaired liver function (elevated concentrations of liver transaminases to twice normal concentration), pulmonary edema and cerebral or visual symptoms(5). HELLP syndrome is considered the most severe variant of PE, characterized by more severe thrombocytopenia, more fulminant microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and more profoundly elevated liver function tests(11).

The diagnosis of severe PE/HELLP, along with their distinction from TTP and aHUS are critical because the only treatment is delivery, whereas pregnancy can continue in patients with TTP-aHUS(11,12).

Pregnancy-associated TMAs: thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura – atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-aHUS)

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is a rare (1 in 25,000 pregnancies) life-threatening hematologic disorder, in which microthrombi develop in small blood vessels due to the lack of ADAMTS13 enzyme activity, leading to the persistence of ultra-large multimers of von Willebrand factor (vWF), activating platelet receptors and, consequently, platelet aggregation(13). Rarely, congenital TTP (Upshaw-Schulman syndrome) arises from mutations in the ADAMTS13 gene(4). More frequently, an acquired form occurs due to autoantibody production that blocks enzyme activity(13). Approximately 10% of women with acquired, antibody-induced TTP (aTTP) and a quarter to half of those with congenital TTP (cTTP) present for the first time during pregnancy, often at the first pregnancy, or postpartum(11). This predisposition may reflect the physiological increase in vWF during pregnancy, which consumes ADAMTS13, and in patients with a genetic predisposition its activity can fall low enough for TMA to manifest(14). A severe deficiency (<5% of the activity in normal plasma) ± the presence of an inhibitor or IgG antibodies strongly supports the diagnosis for TTP. The diagnosis of congenital TTP is dependent on detecting ADAMTS13 activity <5%, in the absence of antibodies to ADAMTS13. The specificity of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (<5%) in distinguishing acute TTP from HUS is 90%(15).

Fetal loss caused by widespread placental ischemia is frequent when TTP occurs in the first and second trimesters, but the incidence of healthy live births approaches 75% to 90% when TTP develops closer to term and when maternal treatment has been successful(11).

An atypical form of HUS is usually seen in association with pregnancy, with no evidence of infection (Shiga toxin-associated HUS)(16). Pregnancy-related atypical HUS is a very severe disease, linked to complement alternative pathway dysregulation, leading to complement-induced endothelial cell damage, with a poor prognosis for maternal kidney function if left without specific efficacious treatment. A study by Bruel et al. reported that in patients with aHUS during pregnancy and those with aHUS in the postpartum period shared the same severe renal outcome (risk of end-stage renal disease [ESRD] of 44-55%), in sharp contrast to the usual complete recovery of kidney function in patients with preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome(17). aHUS is rare and mainly develops in the postpartum period. As with TTP, there is an increased risk of fetal loss or intrauterine growth restriction in pregnant patients with aHUS and is a continued risk of relapse during subsequent pregnancies(18). Follow-up should include serial growth scans and determination of uterine artery flow(2).

Typically, the presentation in aHUS is represented by MAHA, thrombocytopenia, ADAMTS13 activity higher than 10% and serum creatinine above 2.2 mg/dL(11,18). The diagnosis of TMA requires evidence of a microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (hemoglobin level <10 g/dL, presence of schistocytes more than 1%, elevated LDH), undetectable serum haptoglobin, with thrombocytopenia, and the presence of TMA features in kidney (or another organ) biopsy(2). Thrombocytopenia during an acute episode in TTP is generally severe, with a median platelet count of 10-17×109/L at presentation. A higher platelet count (>30×109/L) is suggestive of an alternate TMA, but does not exclude TTP.

Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in TTP (35-40%). The nervous system is the most commonly affected visceral organ at presentation(19) which may be accompanied by renal insufficiency and fever(11). Acute renal failure requiring dialysis is present in 4% to 15% of patients. The absence of severe renal dysfunction helps to differentiate TTP from aHUS, in which oliguric or anuric renal failure is more common(19). As a result of renal impairment in TTP, urinalysis can show variable proteinuria and/or hematuria, and increased plasma urea and serum creatinine level below 2 mg/dL at presentation(18)

Laboratory testing in patients with TTP include: increased indirect bilirubin, a negative direct antiglobulin test, decreased RBC count, reticulocytosis, normal coagulation tests (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen and D-dimers), which should be distinguished from similar disease processes such as immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)(20).

There is no test to rule in or out TTP with enough speed and accuracy to safely guide the initial therapy(21).

If acute TTP is suspected, plasma exchange (PEX) should be promptly initiated(12,21). The effectiveness of plasma therapy has been ascribed to the replacement of ADAMTS13 activity(12). Prophylactic plasma infusions in hereditary TTP result in an excellent fetal and maternal prognosis, by limiting placental micro-occlusion arterial thrombosis(2).

The complement inhibitor eculizumab has been shown to be effective in improving renal function in atypical HUS(21). Reports of the experience with eculizumab in pregnant patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria support its safety in this setting(16).

Discussion and conclusions

TMAs are medical emergencies requiring rapid diag­nosis and appropriate treatment(20). The context (PE, HELLP, severe delivery hemorrhage) in which TMA occurs is of paramount importance(2). In the setting of obstetric complications, HELLP syndrome is the main differential diagnosis from acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP), a rare life-threatening condition(13) (estimated to be 1 to 3 cases per 10,000 deliveries(22)), which typically occurs in the third trimester, but hypoglycemia and coagulopathy are key features of AFLP. The diagnosis can be confirmed with hepatic biopsy, demonstrating microvesicular steatosis(13). However, due to the acute presentation and coagulopathy, it is usually not possible to undertake liver biopsy, and the diagnosis is made by a combination of clinical and biochemical features(18). Obstetricians must clearly communicate to neonatologists the presence of maternal acute fatty liver of pregnancy to ensure that the newborn is appropriately screened and monitored for complications of hypoglycemia and metabolic derangements(22). Early diagnosis, prompted delivery and supportive care have resulted in improved maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality(23).

Preeclampsia and HELLP must be distinguished from other TMA disorders that warrant non-delivery interventions. Unfortunately, delays in diagnosis and treatment may be life-threatening(4).

Complement has been involved in the etiology of TMA(24). Taken together, studies to date indicate complex interactions among complement dysregulation, pregnant state and pregnancy complications, including preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. An intriguing question remains as to whether some forms of HELLP syndrome may be, in fact, cases of thrombotic microangiopathy due to complement dysregulation that can be treated with therapies other than induction of delivery(25).

Regarding late-onset congenital TTP (cTTP) presenting de novo in an obstetrical context, it usually occurs during the second half of pregnancy and early postpartum (mostly as a consequence of the progressive increase in von Willebrand factor multimers concentration through­out pregnancy), but rare cases may occur during the first trimester. In some rare cases of late-onset cTTP, the first pregnancy is not associated with a classical TTP but with a short-term outcome combining an early miscarriage and a transient thrombocytopenia. In these particular cases, the diagnosis of TTP is most often missed during the first pregnancy(26). Clinicians should be aware in cases of late onset congenital TTP that anemia may not be considered pathological and the thrombocytopenia may be at levels often seen in gestational or immune thrombocytopenia. The blood film confirms the presence of microangiopathy and evaluates platelet morphology and the accuracy of automated platelet counts(18). Pregnant patients who present with MAHA and thrombocytopenia should be screened for autoantibody, infections and HIV. TMA can also occur in response to drugs(20).

Even though pregnancy and postpartum have long been recognized as high-risk periods for different forms of TMA, pregnancy-associated TMA still raises challenging diagnostic and therapeutic issues and should be managed in a specialized center(2).  

 

Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Bibliografie

  1. Koucký M, Toman A, Ryšavá R, Pařízek A. Thrombotic microangiopathy and pregnancy. Ceska Gynekol. 2020;85(1):18-28.

  2. Fakhouri F, et al. Management of thrombotic microangiopathy in pregnancy and postpartum: report from an international working group. Blood. 2020;136(19):2103-2117. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005221.

  3. Kremer Hovinga JA, Coppo P, Lämmle B, Moake JL, Miyata T, Vanhoorelbeke K. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17020. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.20.

  4. Gupta M, Feinberg BB, Burwick RM. Thrombotic microangiopathies of pregnancy: Differential diagnosis. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;12:29-34. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2018.02.007.

  5. Serra B, et al. A new model for screening for early-onset preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):608.e1-608.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.020.

  6. Velauthar L, et al. First trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 ;43(5):500-7. doi: 10.1002/uog. 13275.

  7. Fishel Bartal M, Sibai BM. Preeclampsia, Protocol 50. Protocols for High-Risk Pregnancies: An Evidence-Based Approach, Seventh Edition, 2020.

  8. Poon LC, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12802.

  9. O’Gorman N, et al.  Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):103.e1-103.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.034.

  10. Bujold E, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):402-414. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a.

  11. Cines DB, Levine LD. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Blood. 2017;130(21):2271-2277. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-781971.

  12. Mwita JC, Vento S, Benti T. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura-Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome and pregnancy. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:255. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.17.255.2940.

  13. Subtil SFC, Mendes JMB, Areia ALFA, Moura JPAS. Update on Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy. Atualização sobre trombocitopenia na gravidez. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42(12):834-840.

  14. Yu A. Thrombotic Microangiopathies.11th ed., Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney, 2019.

  15. Scully M, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and other thrombotic microangiopathies. British Journal of Haematology. 2012;158(3):323-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09167.x.

  16. Myers B. Diagnosis and management of maternal thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. British Journal of Haematology. 2012;158(1):3-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09135.x.

  17. Bruel A, et al. Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Pregnancy and Postpartum. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(8):1237-1247. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00280117.

  18. Thomas M, Robinson S, Scully M. How we manage thrombotic microangiopathies in pregnancy. British Journal of Haematology. 2016; 173(6): 821-830. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14045.

  19. Chiasakul T, Cuker A. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of TTP: an integrated approach. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov;2018(1):530-538. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.530.

  20. Zini G, De Cristofaro R. Diagnostic Testing for Differential Diagnosis in Thrombotic Microangiopathies. Turk J Haematol. 2019;36(4):222-229.doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2019.2019.0165. 

  21. Shatzel JJ, Taylor JA. Syndromes of Thrombotic Microangiopathy. Med Clin North Am. 2017;101(2):395-415. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.09.010.

  22. Naoum EE, Leffert LR, Chitilian HV, Gray KJ, Bateman BT. Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy: Pathophysiology, Anesthetic Implications, and Obstetrical Management. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(3):446-461. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002597.

  23. Nelson DB, Byrne JJ, Cunningham FG. Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;63(1):152-164. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000494.

  24. Palma LMP, Sridharan M, Sethi S. Complement in Secondary Thrombotic Microangiopathy. Kidney Int Rep. 2021; 6(1):11-23. doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2020.10.009.

  25. Jim B, Garovic VD. Acute Kidney Injury in Pregnancy. Semin Nephrol. 2017;37(4):378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.05.010.

  26. Coppo P, Veyradier A. TTP in the setting of pregnancy: The story still has to be written. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2020; 18(10): 2775-2777. doi: 10.1111/jth.15030.

Articole din ediţiile anterioare

ORIGINAL ARTICLES | Ediţia 2 70 / 2022

Evaluarea riscului complicaţiilor materno-fetale prin utilizarea scorului de severitate a sindromului metabolic (MetS) la gravide

Cristina Oana Daciana Teodorescu, Andrei George Teodorescu, Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Amorin Remus Popa, Alexandru Emil Baetu

Sindromul metabolic (MetS) este caracterizat printr-o distribuţie anormală a ţesutului adipos, rezistenţă la insulină, dislipidemie aterogenă, hipe...

12 iulie 2022
REVIEW ARTICLES | Ediţia 3 71 / 2023

Inflamaţia în obezitatea maternă – mecanisme patologice şi impactul asupra rezultatelor naşterii şi a sănătăţii fătului

Ioana Păvăleanu, Răzvan Socolov, Roxana Covali, Adina Pricope-Veselin

Creşterea prevalenţei obezităţii în rândul femeilor de vârstă reproductivă a condus la o proporţie semnificativă a sarcinilor la femei cu indice de...

29 octombrie 2023
REVIEW ARTICLES | Ediţia 4 69 / 2021

Sarcina implantată pe cicatricea operaţiei cezariene: propunere a unui ghid de practică medicală pentru diagnostic şi tratament

Dimitrie Pelinescu Onciul, Roxana-Elena Bohîlţea

Având în vedere numărul mare de intervenţii chirurgicale de tipul operaţiei cezariene în România şi faptul că am întâlnit în practica noastră mai m...

20 decembrie 2021
REVIEW ARTICLES | Ediţia 1 68 / 2020

Sarcina implantată pe cicatricea operaţiei cezariene – management

George Iancu, Radu Botezatu, Nicolae Gică, L. Mustaţă, Corina Gică, Anca Marina Ciobanu, Gheorghe Peltecu, Anca Maria Panaitescu

Sarcina implantată pe cicatricea operaţiei cezariene este o complicaţie potenţială a sarcinii survenite la o femeie cu mai multe naşteri prin opera...

16 martie 2020